IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Sat, 29 October 2011 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8563821F84D4; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.243
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.243 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.357, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KEct+xyomWsw; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E0021F84D3; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:616:213:d4ff:fe04:3e08] (shalmaneser.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:616:213:d4ff:fe04:3e08]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "petithug", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E28D2087B; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:14:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4EAC8AE0.3020307@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:23:12 -0700
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111010 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
References: <4EAC6BF4.2000604@alvestrand.no> <CALiegf=f4kFzyDLWK+Y5vbuCEJFXX590+VuZ4bbnHZnvX0CoBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=f4kFzyDLWK+Y5vbuCEJFXX590+VuZ4bbnHZnvX0CoBA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:23:16 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/29/2011 03:36 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/10/29 Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>:
>> - I do not think it's appropriate to use "turn" and "turns" for indicating
>> transport. Polluting the URI namespace with more configuration parameters in
>> the form of trailing "s" is a Bad Thing.
> 
> But there should be some way to indicate that a TURN server listens in
> TLS, right?
> 

We should continue this discussion in BEHAVE, but I would like to ask the OP to
send a pointer on the RFC or discussion that says that using a trailing "s" to
indicate security is a bad thing.

Thanks.

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Personal email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Professional email: petithug@acm.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk6sit4ACgkQ9RoMZyVa61dhpgCfZv+XuDhAljo3N0s33zbh6l0E
aWAAmwUP2mvcZiY9BLB5BAsjoe6OULMl
=yx3i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email