Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft

"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com> Mon, 30 April 2012 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38B221F87CA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fOohupmb3NKO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6398321F8595 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MCHP063A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.61]) by senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (Server) with ESMTP id 9C7F81EB840B; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:31:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.55]) by MCHP063A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.61]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:31:49 +0200
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: "igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com" <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:31:48 +0200
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
Thread-Index: Ac0m8BnmtpvCnyaOQguU+nI48V3YuQADiOHw
Message-ID: <101C6067BEC68246B0C3F6843BCCC1E31299282765@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
References: <CA+9kkMCYArLPRP3c00UdOja64WRT6ghN0PSy7XvM_wbxBBB+vA@mail.gmail.com>, <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F066@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <BLU169-W7C59E1EDB4CB06B648577932B0@phx.gbl> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E23AFFF@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <2E496AC9-63A0-464A-A628-7407ED8DD9C4@phonefromhere.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E23B16B@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <E2714FBC-D06B-4A12-9E07-C49EBF55084C@phonefromhere.com> <4F9EC0B2.10903@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F9EC0B2.10903@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_101C6067BEC68246B0C3F6843BCCC1E31299282765MCHP058Agloba_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:31:51 -0000

Whether anybody has been successful in the past with this type of use case is I think irrelevant.

The enterprise call centre use case is I think a vital use case because it is a scenario in which one user is only concerned that they can securely reach an organization/domain and is not concerned about the individual within that domain  that they communicate with.  A suspect quite a large percentage of RTCWEB applications will be like this and it is not covered in the current use case draft.

So I think we need it.

Regards
Andy




From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Igor Faynberg
Sent: 30 April 2012 17:41
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft

Without numbers it is impossible to argue, but, if we talk about the perceived need, I disagree.  Think of the people who travel abroad and cannot call the 800 number. (I routinely use Web interface for calls when traveling.)

I am all for  the use case, as described by Jim.

Igor

On 4/30/2012 9:54 AM, Tim Panton wrote:
...
I can't tell you the actual numbers, but when presented with the choice of calling a toll free number
or clicking a button marked "free internet call" - almost no-one on a real, busy site clicked the button.
( for every button click there were several orders of magnitude more 0800 calls from that page).


So from my perspective this is a legacy interop use case with almost zero user acceptance.

(as far as I can see no-one has made this use-case desirable in practice yet.)
Tim.






_______________________________________________

rtcweb mailing list

rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb