Re: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Mon, 16 April 2012 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E7621F8610 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VrDuQjyd57ve for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C7A21F85ED for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7b07ae000006839-2e-4f8bda2c1504
Authentication-Results: mailgw7.ericsson.se x-tls.subject="/CN=esessmw0184"; auth=fail (cipher=AES128-SHA)
Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client CN "esessmw0184", Issuer "esessmw0184" (not verified)) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 2A.44.26681.C2ADB8F4; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:37:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:37:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4F8BDA2B.3040204@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:36:59 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org, EKR <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <4F732531.2030208@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F732531.2030208@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:37:03 -0000

WG, EKR

The deadline for this call of consensus has ended. I note that there has
been discussion of a number of details and additional views on the
actual consensus statement made. Some supporting the consensus from the
meeting room and some opposing it. In the end I determine that the two
consensus statements are confirmed:

 The first was that there was overwhelming consensus that all RTP
 packets SHALL be protected by SRTP.

 Secondly that no one objected against making DTLS-SRTP a mandatory to
 implement and the default keying mechanism. Additional mechanisms are
 not precluded.

>From the discussion in the thread I would note the following:

1) Null cipher for encryption is strongly desired but an actual proposal
is needed for how to express this.

2) Details of the SRTP and DTLS-SRTP usage in this WG needs to be
defined. This is for continued discussion. I hope our editor of the
security architecture can make a proposal to the WG to consider.

3) The discussion of additional keying mechanisms such as Security
Descriptions and Encrypted Key Transport will continue.

Cheers

Magnus

On 2012-03-28 16:50, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> WG,
> 
> In todays RTCWEB WG meeting there was discussion around media security
> mechanism. In this meeting there was some clear consensus in the
> meeting which we would like to confirm on the list.
> 
> The first was that there was overwhelming consensus that all RTP
> packets SHALL be protected by SRTP.
> 
> Secondly that no one objected against making DTLS-SRTP a mandatory to
> implement and the default keying mechanism. Additional mechanisms are
> not precluded.
> 
> WG participants may state their position regarding these consensus calls
> until 12th of April when the chairs will declare the final consensus. If
> you where present in the meeting room and comment on this, please
> indicate that.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Magnus Westerlund
> For the WG chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------