[rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 30 September 2013 08:08 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCECD21F9D42 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.673
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.673 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.575, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgWfW65W8mbD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5678E21F9D1C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f9a8e000005620-ba-52493167f9ca
Received: from ESESSHC020.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E9.00.22048.76139425; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:08:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.146]) by ESESSHC020.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:07:48 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections
Thread-Index: Ac69tBInSk4xBHAwQSOQDX27ZZb6/A==
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:07:47 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4AFB57@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.18]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4AFB57ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW66oWeQwZKlYhZr/7WzOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY/H+mIKdyhWdLUINjOfkuhg5OSQETCTafq9mh7DFJC7cW8/W xcjFISRwmFFi++9XLBDOEkaJT09Xs3YxcnCwCVhIdP/TBmkQEVCXuPzwAlizsICNxIxFncwQ cUeJrTs+M0HYehIfrrcwgbSyCKhKTN9pCBLmFfCV2LF3G1grI9De76fWgJUzC4hL3Hoynwni HgGJJXvOM0PYohIvH/9jhbAVJT6+2scIUZ8vcfLtV2aImYISJ2c+YZnAKDQLyahZSMpmISmD iOtILNj9iQ3C1pZYtvA1M4x95sBjJmTxBYzsqxjZcxMzc9LLzTcxAgP+4JbfBjsYN90XO8Qo zcGiJM774a1zkJBAemJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5q8SFGJg5OqQbGxjDNMN1Zxy8cPPRA5nriBc/5 cqceGrRuWKTgIzSVceMUpkuHNVliX8Yzpfim72y+nBvMrXTGb3rZl/QHK9L7tqsuXOEjwiX/ xrDBy+B8s4ul7FkBK6v8xpuJfgZXJQM+bntukj/pc3zpsp+ubf//Ce7zE7O/lip0xKmw7lLJ l142Da4Q34dKLMUZiYZazEXFiQD3p5d+RgIAAA==
Subject: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:08:32 -0000

Hi,

JSEP talks about the usage of multiple PeerConnection to support forking, i.e. for each new forked leg (SIP: early dialog) a new PeerConnection is created.

As has been indicated, as each new PeerConnection will have its own set of address properties, ICE properties etc, so a new Offer will have to be created and sent to inform the remote about the new properties.

So far so I good.

I also assume that the same camera/mic/etc sources are connection to each PeerConnection, so the number of m- lines in the Offer of the new PeerConnection should be the same.

However, according the 3264, the ORDER of the m- lines also need to be kept the same.

So, my question is: how can I ensure that the order of the m- lines in an Offer for a new PeerConnection is the same as in an Offer for an old PeerConnection?

Regards,

Christer