Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 10 December 2013 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8E81AE15D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:24:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J63C9jHBiNfP for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB891AE158 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orochi-2.roach.at (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rBAFOUEN084514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:24:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <52A73228.1030400@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:24:24 -0600
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <52A603B8.3090904@dcrocker.net> <E25D14E7-7936-4C92-ADFC-A8CE36DCE980@cisco.com> <52A60DF2.6010301@dcrocker.net> <52A6E025.9070205@ericsson.com> <52A72948.9010901@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <52A72948.9010901@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 99.152.145.110 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Unacceptable - (Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:24:46 -0000

On 12/10/13 08:46, Dave Crocker wrote:
> As I noted, 2/3 of the choices were positive.  That biases response 
> patterns.

I don't think we need to go around accusing the chairs of biasing 
towards success as if it's something bad.

/a