Re: [rtcweb] DataChannels API and external negotiation

"piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com> Mon, 01 April 2013 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <piranna@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F4E21F8564 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 01:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6WsDNft9RzCN for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 01:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com (mail-wg0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E285321F85A2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 01:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b12so1917211wgh.30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 01:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zfApoKPZyWaXo+272fRmiFQW5J+aWIUtwg8441Gzhq0=; b=fa9XnAt0YFsUZXiPG69vSjuCjGGW+nU56gRwjq6wiNiQtaSWGgvXt9fIZ+t0UjlJ/X QMeCC1ajxI+OPA81gayBq0iVk79vXbLmMqAY1ACBg0wHP6Blf+cL3Xca5og8RUYvs+G6 bdWVmg+qFFdQf7OPgEqC7w7rZBE279LTjBu1nlWU6c6DYZ0KOF8AaWG7pwh12qNrZITB FSAACKGW8J8tjPdYKHCoq2uAXubKcP/4Ep5UyV3DCgpmga/kNBUIgy5Iaew0XpvRrak0 i0aj8lbYW9jD6jA9unDGfIucwdMWC+ZKM6Bty42+o9bCgzTJ+bd07NbScruTl2C8smiB Qpcg==
X-Received: by 10.180.108.106 with SMTP id hj10mr8863358wib.0.1364804178038; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 01:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.219.135 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 01:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5158F0FC.3070104@jesup.org>
References: <5158F0FC.3070104@jesup.org>
From: "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 10:15:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKfGGh1kBajiFFNknf5HtV2GF=wi7pGm6sbwiJhLFsmwhLecuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:24:37 -0700
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DataChannels API and external negotiation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:31:33 -0000

> /* If either maxRetransmitTime or maxRetransmitNum are set, it's
>    unreliable, else it's a reliable channel.  If both are set it's an
>    error.

I don't think so (except if it's a limitation of SCTP that I didn't
know, so this message is useless). I think it would make sense to be
able to set both maxRetransmitTime and maxRetransmitNum at the same
time, only that since they are maximus limits it would be effective
the first to be reached.



--
"Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
Unix."
– Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux