Re: [rtcweb] VP8 in ISO (Re: Plan for MTI video codec?)

Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com> Sun, 19 October 2014 01:34 UTC

Return-Path: <agouaillard@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF321A0143 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7dcil5xpSoK for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B66B1A00CF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wm4so2290063obc.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2xiqJIM+vZy8umDkGq8mo1s30NemYDg4TRGh7brKPGE=; b=cfhORu0P1HXvLnJw7FBFXC1zV9+5ZEaYYisGefMBnsIGCL4oVCH2rGkyeAxaADKgKP EqbGu9BJ3BbgvhUoSJeSFAtcjmslBmUh46a/dZ/8k6k8WqI2UzQXYkeGePMpaKaCYKH/ 3XeDBK3bV37adPQpCliyX8IHrIoHHBdxkyerPcgK6iQSbYAKJpfLnyPxVGM3sWpPipvZ wNZz76BrnlrknDaHWGhM35re/ET0j/G6OhBjbM2YAOemVaPA6d8LAnm5aa7IjF/oWhN6 axio95azwZpIzQVipVyRMPUTHKUCZun/2MsXXHnz3dDOKiyzBFsVrXiOOWTiiXdLth2P 4xow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.248.138 with SMTP id ym10mr14774388obc.5.1413682453487; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.66.5 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5442DAAF.6020304@alvestrand.no>
References: <CAGTXFp-HVJDwd86207PNM2QVYO4Z_K4WF-KarnRs1fb7nvy4zA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDfES8gpi0-PTXpCnQHjFYUSF2r44TNzH5B4UfDGo8PtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp8O-7ACksk3v3f=KjCkcDb4e8G=t-e=EJ1503vt7TkpCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp867AMUZ_fEKxG9uAoR1H1AirVHi3-ayJ=KTQk9L+C7+g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAZufR7gUrwkS7Tf5GOfg+ZtsZWGcn-8YLCvnmYnTgfFw@mail.gmail.com> <544035DE.8000606@matthew.at> <CABkgnnUNgWaauS6-nZ5fcExjsMPy4ZGPXaahduzA39=iqh9+fQ@mail.gmail.com> <D5D11F2B-9E32-4932-A601-F1D7FD50C706@gmail.com> <544117FB.6050706@alvestrand.no> <CAHgZEq6GTk5ei+LLpWPM5povpieompD66VU9F+u7--WJVgapaQ@mail.gmail.com> <5442DAAF.6020304@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:34:13 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq6YzE8oke_zSAnxkh=iLg=pFYn9pe45QPNGJD-doKOw2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c29d5e77256c0505bc9866
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/VVLEtBQ0_gX7YDhJNeZzoEnElT8
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 in ISO (Re: Plan for MTI video codec?)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 01:34:16 -0000

Thanks harald for the update.

I'm tempted to say that this is the only event I can think off, based on
the results of the previous pool, that would motivate some from changing
their mind. Hence putting the MTI discussion back on the table before any
progress on VP8 in IOS is, IMHO, useless.

Alex.

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

>
> Changing the subject line, since this is information that more people
> may be interested in having called out clearly:
>
> On 10/18/2014 11:08 PM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD wrote:
> > +1 to not having MTI codec discussion unless some progress has been
> > made on VP8 at MPEG. Any news on that?
>
> The VCB spec (VP8 in ISO) is in DIS ballot, and the ballot closes in
> January.
> ISO processes are complex, and I don't always understand them, but if
> the ballot results are positive, the standard should be approved.
>
> So far, we have not seen any official feedback, but all the unofficial
> feedback I've seen has been more or less editorial in nature.
>
> There are no technical changes that would cause any issues in
> compatibility between VP8 and VCB.
>
>


-- 
Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTO - Temasys Communications, S'pore / Mountain View
President - CoSMo Software, Cambridge, MA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard

   -