Re: [rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-24: (with COMMENT)
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 10 June 2015 15:58 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9851A8852; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VX7Wf8f58NoK; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CE401B319F; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f799f6d000000faf-f4-55785ea1dc5c
Received: from ESESSHC014.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 66.ED.04015.1AE58755; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:58:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:58:25 +0200
Message-ID: <55785EA0.6000803@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:58:24 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150610104740.4842.50101.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150610104740.4842.50101.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7CuIpQg+MXDS0OLb7EajHjz0Rm i7X/2tkdmD1aVvUyeyxZ8pMpgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK+PEvtXMBd95KuYvVm5g3MnVxcjJ ISFgIrFj92ZGCFtM4sK99WxdjFwcQgJHGSWaHixlAkkICSxnlNi9xATE5hXQluh9N5kNxGYR UJVY+OwGK4jNJmAhcfNHI1hcVCBKYurjdSwQ9YISJ2c+AbNFBJwl3lz6AzaTWUBU4tXDKcwg trBAisSnr1egdjlIHNk0H2wmp4CjxJwjS4BqOIDq7SUebC2DaJWXaN46mxmiXFuioamDdQKj 4Cwk22YhdMxC0rGAkXkVo2hxanFSbrqRkV5qUWZycXF+nl5easkmRmDIHtzy22AH48vnjocY BTgYlXh4FWeVhwqxJpYVV+YeYpTmYFES552xOS9USCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUovqg0J7X4ECMTB6dU AyPHZI3GaYXH++asz9dOu/9QPuSO8/t3V7nLTjHLvZBKDONNN2iPm5otHlN/4gTLM/6e+2Zs eRrPRb8cm9YnKsX5cUWymcu6d9dXxk/lsWiz+f0ybrYm/5EM9pbL5ZorKth1WrKDP58S/zjx BOv66jXnQmb7XpTkvcK7dXvdz4wEWz79D71i85RYijMSDbWYi4oTAcfi9AY6AgAA
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Vg4gF2ETbbyl2ePacXqbbG9kwJs>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-24: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:58:47 -0000
Hi Barry, Barry Leiba skrev den 2015-06-10 12:47: > > This document uses the terminology from > [I-D.ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy] and > [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview]. > > I'm not making this a DISCUSS, but I think that definitions of > terminology that are necessary for the understanding of the document need > to be normative references. I think that makes those two references > normative, not informative. > I am changing the rtp-grouping-taxonomy to a normative reference. See discussion with Ben. This of course will result in the need for a new IETF last call for the downref. But, that is probably good, as also the WG needs time to digest the many small changes. However, my personal view is that IETF need to be able to reference concept and basic definitions from informational documents without making it normative references. Otherwise we will have a lot of things in the downref registry and not be able to find when we end up in actual real issues with protocol mechanisms and their source and maturity. That is why I intended to leave draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview as an informational reference. Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf… Barry Leiba
- Re: [rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-… Magnus Westerlund