Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Tue, 09 July 2013 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA3B21F9EFF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p0JS1YBEcJqL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BB421F9E01 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netb.Speedport_W_700V ([91.35.39.121]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Ldttv-1UXCXi0kzb-00j0BY; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:26:11 +0200
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:26:08 +0200
Message-ID: <rjhot81beom5klmus2q346aoothq1ob7nv@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <CA+9kkMAaaT5RRLUrGvzs0zB0jXRQdHLm5HJH5-VkT5p1ZetVPQ@mail.gmail.com> <51DC3644.4020107@bbs.darktech.org>
In-Reply-To: <51DC3644.4020107@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5s1D8fWbuK/EuTYpHDCGQCdYLJMCm6LXV5ZE0+yRJflalu744ER zswa6oug3U9iWsoBpgNk0GfamPIxt0WwKqwfNYct8ngWyYGsTXUOVf8XwPFkMQQi7k8MfNy lEMgxXSeOXsL7pohgRfR5GnzXuJUUmYODIhiCTOuKE8IQYWnpLpKtA5Kp++RrR+mfQ/Ctzg Bhn2zEPPR/Z/5ZKbHESkQ==
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Locus of API discussion
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:26:33 -0000

* cowwoc wrote:
>     I agree, with one caveat: virtually none of the high-level 
>stakeholders (spec editors, browser vendors, etc) bother to engage the 
>community on public-webrtc.

W3C's Web Real-Time Communications Working Group is required to address
all feedback it receives in a timely and technically sound manner. Take
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2013AprJun/0081
up Anne van Kesteren's offer to help if that is not working out for you.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/