Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft

[Randell Jesup <[e-mail]>]

On 4/30/2012 7:41 AM, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 06:43 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
>> Ted Hardie wrote:
>>> The chairs would like to ask the working group to focus on the use
>>> case draft. If you have use cases that need to be added to the
>>> document or text changes you'd like to suggest, please send them in
>>
>> I proposed the following use-case back in February, but there wasn't
>> much discussion on actually adding it to the document:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg03357.html
>>
>> Let me know if the WG would like to proceed with something like this.
>
> I think adding another small derivative of the simple video chat (this
> one with peer-to-peer file transfer added) makes a lot of sense. For
> one, we get a use case that requires reliable data (now we only have a
> req for "short latency datagram" which sound like unreliable to me); in
> addition we get a requirement for the data channel API to be able to use
> blobs (as defined in the File API W3C rec) as input/output.

The game case can need both reliable and unreliable data at the same 
time, which gets us reliable, unreliable and multiple streams.

> A third good requirement that can be derived (if we want to) is the
> ability to prioritize data in relation to audio/video.

File transfer or "let me show you the photo I took" while talking would 
do I think.


-- 
Randell Jesup
[e-mail]