IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com> Tue, 18 June 2013 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <agouaillard@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301E521F9967 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9QuW8qEf1P4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C945721F965B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o6so5431056oag.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pkqvicEi0u27hidfbgOcOE1dFgOxQvv/pgrAgcmvh6I=; b=LnMk6jD+8d/vsn1+X72qxgfZ4ebPGKwLIe3NyquEwwKKdgG3WJapBBDzvttGAKvW06 7y9C28mzyoyh0qzbscdaFeAMlPMqN9KIN/PhnWkDiXZxRjVAFThoxPLjAqYntjr9v9Xq FawZVgxmU1EcwQLGtj6K+uoTdjmL5C8lshEPU3ixIbIxWsXo6/veaNw10sJYMsneqwlf SK0szSjXG4PgWBWU2BnX3MvR6RTIOf/muPsovPBpeqEIS7+P1xYKRrvABhBuIsVPeEzE wiGh30pv5w7ByZyw4z6qHhUNjwW8l5ZdZN9LC3eiHpliWuVILVXhunf21FEdPLxZhL6G 8tow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.44.168 with SMTP id f8mr13029906oem.133.1371577241120; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.49.8 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxvwM2gkHgdnZWCRTK0dsEdzwu8Me6v2xBo1soVXqw0Ekg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <51C096E8.2000300@hookflash.com> <CAD5OKxvwM2gkHgdnZWCRTK0dsEdzwu8Me6v2xBo1soVXqw0Ekg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:40:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq5Rkw7+VruPKFe4e-o1VueUvRKT3TnG5vK+QnaCXgs9yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="001a113343d23d39a604df713664"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:40:52 -0000

+1 to reopening the discussion.


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:

> I am also strongly for removing O/A and SDP from the API. This is a wrong
> API surface that does not provide the necessary degree of control for
> building WebRTC apps.
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> ... and to be clear it's SDP with offer/answer that really makes it
>> horrible. Replacing with nicer JSON or a wrapper API solves nothing IMHO.
>>
>> -Robin
>>
>>
>>   Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
>>  18 June, 2013 12:36 PM
>>
>> I would also appreciate that those in favour of mandating SDP as the
>> core communication for WebRTC explain their rationale again (given the
>> number of arguments against SDP and the frustration SDP is causing),
>> and also that they give arguments and responses to all the SDP related
>> issues nicely summarized in this mail:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07873.html
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email