IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees)

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Thu, 12 December 2013 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545A21AE51F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:34:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GLQeUa5DebAV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:34:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EFF1AE51E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:34:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netb.Speedport_W_700V ([91.35.32.99]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LoaCE-1VJnho2IYc-00gULm for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:34:42 +0100
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:34:44 +0100
Message-ID: <6feka91co2pghk9o4qrta4fq50ei3sb2h8@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <186CE8D65BA3A741A81A543F936DD0D10A5803D8@xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com> <A672E2AB-827D-46E8-9EB1-D7ED82B10B94@cisco.com> <20131211193239.GK3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <558F8D49-4024-4DF1-9A9E-AF422F1292C2@iii.ca> <20131212011550.GM3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <E8882BCE-4795-4CF5-B785-18C2141A5DE2@iii.ca> <CAD5OKxvy8xGuiR7oUbJJwTaxGfPJ=MHpd8Hp5MfpPLy8LmNaQg@mail.gmail.com> <D5A2C5EC-C65F-4E39-9A56-315B94C5FB1D@iii.ca> <52AA1642.30104@bbs.darktech.org>
In-Reply-To: <52AA1642.30104@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:evnu3CpIvjB0PWG6vaBRYPG52UOEY8UcbKEeCv58h/RwqyKgLNQ XKXHAP22a7tNyJiwWuYF0PO1nD3693EmE3wfwQlL3s3fwauopqSU647Mh9ssPLf+jSighMs QXzqsB4A6tadmdCwRP4Pw1XL8YAy6gko8pj0pY9ohckmTXk8b/WU2uGhkv4ioEeONiFvMUm FGJtCvkeF+uTHTxj3hhnA==
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 22:34:51 -0000

* cowwoc wrote:
>Two questions about this:
>
> 1. To Google: When is it coming?
> 2. To VP8-detractors: would such a binary change your mind about
>    supporting VP8 as MTI?

Would this be different from <https://tools.google.com/dlpage/webmmf>?
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email