Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)

Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4152421F8B36 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZDL1exCNURn0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (zimbra.westhawk.co.uk [192.67.4.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3DF21F8B0A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.14] (unknown [93.89.81.113]) by zimbra.westhawk.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADF237A903 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:26:54 +0100 (BST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-21-200025068
From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
Resent-From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfk_6pviBMBmYUvj69JA73Uy0rnXaMvThPuGT2R5NOWycQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:13:04 +0100
Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:14:01 +0100
Message-Id: <5C27A46C-7090-452B-B253-AC1BEEEC76E2@phonefromhere.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmYgQ+yb=pDp1J2_PVa1SkxTOuaUCM02Vt6-iGabwif1g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCUTiPO3eASjn0mbRA9YCF6TMmGGOjQ4NkVkvzVMN39Gg@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnx=qoS_pqyC45WVEYEFqj-3eP9g_kyhAUaOO6He_UEfw@mail.gmail.com> <91623260-6A12-4737-8BA9-4D6B60FCD389@phonefromhere.com> <CALiegfk_6pviBMBmYUvj69JA73Uy0rnXaMvThPuGT2R5NOWycQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-To: rtcweb@ietf.org
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?I=F1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Resent-Message-Id: <20111005102654.7ADF237A903@zimbra.westhawk.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:10:55 -0000

On 5 Oct 2011, at 11:09, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Tim, honestly I didn't expect to define the full WebRTC JS API in 5
> minutes while I was writting the mail :)

;-)

> 
> Your points are perfectly valid and should indeed be covered. But I
> didn't want to be so explicit in my immature API suggestion. It was
> just an overview.

I guess what I was getting at was the fact that the SDP seemed 
central to the API - I'd like something more generic and javascript 
friendly as the central concept.


> 
> Regards.
> 
> -- 
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>