Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 10 December 2014 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5836C1A802A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:35:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BhSO_K1DPPSa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:34:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f179.google.com (mail-vc0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6FF1A1BF2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:34:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id le20so1891749vcb.38 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:34:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zcJ42A9uGqCpaeQMftzoGwl58BrpShblU779gGY5pOc=; b=Jkih/msjOS9d8EOroma+bZ3o1WC3f6D5faZWKprMQFy/ot83VbtWVGvGXiRNcrdxln oE/ZSQREKmQOu3kjKs+1BC2u1lo3kmCBJcJI9x95W06uZzOtbHoICtW3P8RryxsrcO10 2CPwKUZKK4jmv1XVywHfs6yFPLwAFnf//X6IBpADwhIuhzTw60jKVSGyMbBkEiP9FuvJ eOrRNu5JLIjD+IvylC/fc5i+YY3t23WVRIFld+BhAoLAzQNREArs0d/S4tcQtkfHz0a5 BelNVmHxl/bJ+R5h3Mur0hrzXrpfPU05zJ9gxx5fEzZN7T1vSVT78LrsaZNh2Te6vJkX y8pQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlFW9Bb3//H7DId45/exAk8rzORUNEfZEIWe8kiCWRNGaEsBnshA1eUdSjGRr12daxl+Bq7
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.10.198 with SMTP id k6mr3756440vdb.38.1418247289836; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:34:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.139.9 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:34:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com>
References: <5486C48D.8040602@alvestrand.no> <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:34:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgT+UF2beMzKchf3guwn1_gc2EZwQ2Y=CiodJj=FdpHUFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334e25ea2b290509e36dbf
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/WDVI-U5CFdOQ5RqrxEH-ErpMf4Y
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:35:04 -0000

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:

>
> > On Dec 9, 2014, at 1:44 , Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
> >
> > I note that the "confirming sense of the room" thread has gotten a lot
> > of messages that are not declaring a position on the question.
> >
> > I also note that from the messages on the thread, I can't figure out if
> > Keith Drage, Gili, Monty Montgomery or Peter Saint-Andre have taken a
> > position (I could guess, but I don't want to - besides, they might not
> > want to take a position, which is perfectly OK).
> >
> > It would be nice for me as a reader if people could:
> >
> > - state their position on the "confirming sense of the room" thread
> > - change the subject line when they want to say anything else
> >
> > That's my preference - of course, people who have "mute thread" in their
> > email readers might want the whole discussion to stay on thread, and
> > will hate me for the last suggestion....
> >
> > Harald
>
> Thanks, Harald, that would help.
>
> I would also like to know from those confirming the sense of the room,
> whether THEY THEMSELVES intend to implement both codecs, or whether they
> conveniently think they don’t need to, and it’s just a problem for other
> people to handle.
>
> Honestly, a +1 for “those other people should do it” is meaningless.
>


This is a reminder that in IETF discussions, participants are individuals,
and entitled to come to their technical positions however they want.  I'd
like to ask folks to refrain from calling the opinions of others
"meaningless" or otherwise using derogatory language. In the IETF, every
individual is entitled to put forward opinions and we debate those opinions
on their own merits, not based on the putative motivations of the
proponent.  That is standard practice in the IETF, and this WG is no
exception.

Thanks,
--Richard



>
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>