Re: [rtcweb] No Plan

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 03 June 2013 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B135E21F8930 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 03:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxubFn1mZXU8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 03:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com (mail-qe0-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DB421F9433 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 03:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q19so2192011qeb.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 03:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=JgUIEebISsHRwB9zkk48JNlP6jOT7XMVK954IAt1ZAg=; b=DWPjYKlC9kNMnEIbvIjtfjqkaNP185uPNmIMXM+Vq6FU/xyBLvGBesjJOD5W65CQu8 dNlqgO9Vkrj/5wL06qviDrnzT4d9aSM0NAd8tCY4YbYIEcDVMClRtPcDWbVa5t3bP9oI oucBPNGlr288fuwiCnlSvXeCLLVQfhkEgsBR1IuKYP9GZ3H+cM1dhFNFXsA0I/IG11jH 6nL5rQlxTfh760s/6YdNotzTIFc7mp5hrHk15NlUO4CrYRt00bUYQKS5bqO8nJOuTO8M cyEoODyQG1tK/xwT3p/MurO7sfopPUGR2mxeVMXmYNOnnSOzk+AdhknJXWuNb56U109X wdBw==
X-Received: by 10.49.16.42 with SMTP id c10mr20979343qed.33.1370254161843; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 03:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.26.103 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 03:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA79oDngfKtnO2eT0yfzBOrszo9RGkKqcbwT2agmWtCOLzXSQQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51A65017.4090502@jitsi.org> <51A7BEBE.2040302@omnitor.se> <CALiegfk6XchF4U1Orpd6oJsydz-VGtBQ=CwaWrPa_KjsaQynYQ@mail.gmail.com> <51A7CD81.2060805@gmail.com> <51A835D7.9060603@omnitor.se> <CALiegfm4R=3mGqTOxBfvCfnsRg=fe=XapA6s-QQNjrsAkg5HEA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA79oDngfKtnO2eT0yfzBOrszo9RGkKqcbwT2agmWtCOLzXSQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:09:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfkJ9nUUPB0P_0tvcUY3vGoRqEYojEW_=MqLS_kJ=r3RQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Rejhon <markybox@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/w3/kE+Psgx+xmOXMfSTg+NGee1xaHNfcxZrBdNoKsT8p74qTo6N7NY+Z4CN0Wsy9dd9S
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] No Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:09:28 -0000

2013/5/31 Mark Rejhon <markybox@gmail.com>om>:
>> Facebook, Google+, Twitter and any other website use their own custom
>> mechanisms for providing chat capabilities to *their own* users
>> *between them*. I don't expect that they will be interested in a
>> peer-to-peer (user-to-user) realtime text because they want to log the
>> messages, inspect them, offer you advertisements based on the content
>> of your "private" chats, etc.
>
>
> Objection, objection!
> They are NOT mutually exclusive.
>
> I have been in contact with Facebook as part of my XEP-0301 authorship (XMPP
> real-time text).
> See this animated GIF of Facebook real-time text concept:
> http://www.realjabber.org/anim/facebook_chat_concept.gif


Hi, I said "user-to-user realtime text", and not
"char-by-char-user-server-user chat" ;)



--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>