Re: [rtcweb] H.264 patent licensing options

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 10 December 2014 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8221AC423 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:43:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IpdRAA1TON1T for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:43:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F6A31AC41A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:43:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id va2so427337obc.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:43:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TOtAjYtyJ2mKpNuGd+q34PRKrVgavPuP8TtEAG9RI6w=; b=wEg2rEOhxT0J14ijMvGxwQB3WLbvH2XnEN+Mvbf/f/4N0EDgB1keu4ifIorkvuIXjM UL412ckSlwRQ8QRXepnlofYjURm3lZxwjdIEiJ38DgKyRsz6spZoaVBj9BORdMMFTx/1 LYYyMIcIbskdll+QnpioIvoalwn/ez9VvmLsb8tYq70D6zfFdN+ZQGPsZ4NKLzai5YO2 YnTvrB8EzX+l4k8bboKt9hj7zW9r6IO9r6lj3u8G4YRHyBAaHA1rJknxXzN/oCNHuDYO ccfR+U8KoBjfKKu3vzMvg4Cz3Jmw2cRp4gkU4T7QhQMqTnYpNOc9k3OAi6GeNMNp43ei MACQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.46.134 with SMTP id v6mr406978obm.34.1418255020679; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.107.19 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:43:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5488D49D.5040307@gmail.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <54820E74.90201@mozilla.com> <54861AD6.8090603@reavy.org> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233998AC05@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <63BC3D6D-03A1-41C2-B92D-C8DD57DC51DB@nostrum.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233998ADF1@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <87d27r9o0a.fsf_-_@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <CABkgnnVYNjYAM=WhpuURHMUkU4mtT7E3a5yvqSG7+fGKXKOoNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRfVowjpLbB-x-j9AU3bL_EOGD2E0baesuL=bE-ME=9cQ@mail.gmail.com> <5488D49D.5040307@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:43:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVi9hCUoKqcDL6e_jzsc7ashgedVQR2f-TSQTixtDVC2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/WILv1oQlxz2MTHZhe75PdpBAOV8
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H.264 patent licensing options
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:43:43 -0000

On 10 December 2014 at 15:17, Sergio Garcia Murillo
<sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote:
> The availability of OpenH264 was proposed here in this list as one argument
> in favor of adopting H264, so IMHO, this should be explained.

I recommend that you reach your own conclusions about whether to
consider OpenH264 as having any bearing on the discussion.