Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Sun, 07 July 2013 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1280E21F9C4F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 14:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WulXFLNCqaTZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 14:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A1D21F9C40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 14:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m6so3381105wiv.15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=X+lJgIeRhaac3KHwQTtLVA4zYdXdkQp/1oR/XSTPSWU=; b=ccqDfXrmS8Wd4nkEE8I+5T439BNeBJs5GEJBTeNO9itCvPP2079k0eBtKKUC1RGUUn tBEwYBB3BVJ53rlDDdJ5B/+xrAWBuEHm+ThqQQrzO6g4iClLHDocjTf/Ry+45cKkzVnm auRWGpvYzdiadA+pi8P7Z44393qvrdDw8lWZsYHr8hf+TVoiCdmqvDfTWYOo8mYANc2q gRHj7MV5Frnr6x6D0xTlQ0xQlQoVyCTerakk7jRS5KFavjU2ZGiBZwaKcwq1f0ds9SK2 dylEQzFSOxKgjVGr8raIGP4gMGBlQNTlI88iIvdu+ImcUqLlKb8O03HVVartk4tvHpCW ONYg==
X-Received: by 10.194.178.138 with SMTP id cy10mr10616865wjc.61.1373231695025; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b20sm20245512wiw.4.2013.07.07.14.14.53 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e11so3208283wgh.30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.85.6 with SMTP id d6mr27525582wiz.47.1373231693136; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.221.202 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 14:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 17:14:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_H=E5kansson_LK?= <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0442808e438c5404e0f26b2a
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQno5cwBTkpVgJsjMqTShCEMSVKMV2NC9CVt2/i40VAskV3kiw+fVh/lqF1nIX5AMcIwlAAh
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 21:15:03 -0000

On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>; wrote:

> On 7/3/13 11:37 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >     I'm glad to be wrong here.  Is the phrase "you shouldn't have to
> >     modify the SDP but rather there should be API points to cover most
> >     of the use cases"  the consensus of the working group?
> >
> >
> > I thought it was, but I'm not the chair, so maybe you could ask Harald or
> > Stefan.
>
> I definitely think this is the consensus of the working group.
>
>
Can you point out when exactly this consensus was reached? This is news to
me, but I definitely could have missed something.
_____________
Roman Shpount