Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 08 July 2013 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C05521F9C10 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bxWNX3viqbc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f51.google.com (mail-qe0-f51.google.com [209.85.128.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D4D21F9C0A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f51.google.com with SMTP id a11so2447574qen.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=dTtgg0KONTrlrIIYRQMfxpjAEvjILkoUmfkwH/ky5S0=; b=eOqExiKqo2PXzTrVlCUyvVu2hMLlTKsm+VSr9AudcO603niVF0x7yema9zBHVJ/PBE bNxUo5MSK7czOXhDbaoWjl1yS3l6uXQ9ec9rnylAjD43jV+0SV2xS6Bby+ZUbpisuWYi hTSTkcV9YZA5FXlSc5KYRSF7HkJv0bGEFUHP5CGS9ZWiY4dMWWNv7wJAm7cW5sVfoJQY DCVYXtAeFXr5quxW85pRkdsxa4s+LCz7Am0QpyKi94TDc8PLtx9+se98xwx7gzu8SYMP VfsL3atooPc/xW16+kzniQT0qIOANWQPcdy9uZcEOiI6phDl7cS3A1cEzqEy5vHHbhKt w8TQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.115.5 with SMTP id g5mr19491390qaq.53.1373300327073; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.48.234 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [63.245.219.150]
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxuBmZxvDXD2Doc-7HH2sSK2neZH7v-W2XS_R+RTBkwveA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281057BD4@GENSJZMBX01.msg.int.genesyslab.com> <CAD5OKxuBmZxvDXD2Doc-7HH2sSK2neZH7v-W2XS_R+RTBkwveA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:18:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMVC1kJJubunTsy_wgS=AjZjCiajvbjMYpLmihVp+U2Dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc95142a570b04e102661c
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSdj1xE8CcOnu3b8N0jFw0qKwR7/u285XV4LWL/7sum7Io+qeuzWBUrvFrwBV80m/otgGU
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:18:53 -0000

Y


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>; wrote:

>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>wrote:
>
>>  As I recall the consensus, developers are supposed to be able to modify
>> the SDP, but we needed to specify what parts of the SDP could be modified.
>>  In other words, there might be some limits to what could be modified, but
>> we haven’t yet determined/agreed on what they are.****
>>
>>
>>
> This is exactly what I thought.
>
> Yes, this matches my understanding as well. However, I believe there was
also
general agreement that most things one would want to do should be
doable without modifying SDP.

-Ekr