IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-00.txt

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 13 July 2021 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D753A0CB1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=telurix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id io5lzliFLg8q for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3701E3A0CB2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id ay16so2127937qvb.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1zJ0jeSLcY9kUmJ4d1tABvItbJktArkW//lJJ4yDXL0=; b=paHZEH0QY/QYjp/rGTVtcrr3SvpF5qL4QpDxSBhJt4N+NsQtJyDD5bKWeC4zWHNua1 xJWrdrxSUT08w0PbzpsRHoo+Bt9kulM1sSHbRzaizuGT5jytlrKoTQIFLjv5ZCpA6QYq H4jXCIvVlI07FrWpN8PAEFCkBO10petFwxVdA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1zJ0jeSLcY9kUmJ4d1tABvItbJktArkW//lJJ4yDXL0=; b=RIWyqBjaY73jpORHZCIeRAFEqDeR7QoBHpmspimAXu+YN5oQVpU22Yh+eO8cfb7rHN CezGaYIXGjBjH+i6b/3E1TCkJ2P/0xv0CCa+VNoyBQIBWHfyjvsMcTSq39UyfcqffMp5 ULICa/CLb2s1hf1AMJwsrUBM50hTfE87p+nrXIcQ0UtdBtsU7iyiQfQ96s6AsoK3IeFR fiSCsKFbsbi3ksoZG3GVm1RECrDpz69bREPAMnaqA1p77YUBKYbpjSsHOkD+ZuMcAUkX QmVqlFgCls3nFu5N3amHs+EBPsB66Z6q+BgbEJOEO67Q+ujdReGncw7OI4nURzIB1xmE kn+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ci4odRONCCTmFT0dvYArrpm7WIqLTSZ/CZxyitw8JBUbvrG8J 1Ky6jixpxrMjRGgotfSn72GM82dB0Ky9QA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTASQmgC7zQ1UbRzMfb+T/85beTVFJDM1RSP3I1yKCOOkpw6dniIlPuqU+mUA5e3SkMmh2VA==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4b70:: with SMTP id m16mr6514646qvx.3.1626202600095; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f169.google.com (mail-yb1-f169.google.com. [209.85.219.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b4sm6993997qtx.65.2021.07.13.11.56.39 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f169.google.com with SMTP id o139so36435482ybg.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:404:: with SMTP id 4mr7721743ybe.171.1626202599117; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162596540685.23062.11654727411981880816@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zArqmDB1SVkEna_h9gZ7MC=fsio==-Wsb5aJN5Oi-xUdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxswQysOL2SCSKkYvzqWfD9v=mH=dzuYtJkXcU=kRovGHw@mail.gmail.com> <CALe60zDTJ0dGJBsdm3xdeNQgb_u1n20_3FJ-ueipzcFTjcF7VQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALe60zBQfM0v2N6j1FoGAZnKCSRFg8Ohu16WV4J16RTqnm09eg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxu-mN=0nnpt4dvG0EA4O3Qj0SWLNL5RVjaPPhRxC1O_DA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOLzse2=iY3EOZC8h1QGxBuYK6Baz0WECHKix96g_7dwCjzR_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuEH-jBc3CKWUiHbaLja-fYhe==LHX55bDJDk4puHJ3xw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOLzse0PfFLh7r3sMCtDp+=2xdk_7RRfQ1k90VBMd+LGfovcMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOLzse0PfFLh7r3sMCtDp+=2xdk_7RRfQ1k90VBMd+LGfovcMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:56:27 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxuhXUA8PVe_Z7Zn9CVe7OJ09dbzeNS1SxYTRKNu8ZnB0g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxuhXUA8PVe_Z7Zn9CVe7OJ09dbzeNS1SxYTRKNu8ZnB0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com>
Cc: Justin Uberti <justin@uberti.name>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000040d74105c705ccb2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/WORyTdwylf8fFlfuDQ1a1XDdG_Y>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:56:47 -0000

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:21 PM Justin Uberti <
juberti@alphaexplorationco.com> wrote:

> The problem though is that if you are setting bundle-only you also need to
> zero the port, which opens up the whole can of worms with deployed
> applications that we were hoping to avoid. Limiting it to IceRestart would
> reduce the risk but not eliminate it.
>

Anything BUNDLE compliant should be able to handle m= lines with port 0 and
a=bundle-only, but it can be an issue for some existing implementations.


> It would be good to hear of at least one example of this causing an actual
> problem before spending substantial energy here, I think. Note also that
> this would be a change to BUNDLE, not to JSEP.
>

BUNDLE was already modified to handle this: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04
section 7.6 (
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04.html#section-7.6
)

I guess, if someone really needs this, they can munge the SDP.
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email