Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3A621F9AC2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.153, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2snYoRZYDmop for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3C721F9AA9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q56so4334001wes.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kHMgG97EsKokaAyurpwwcbg2P1/ReWn18d3dWpFFmyU=; b=hNXDn3TiNPePNCVgTvZeUdwUYJZoF3eFHGJA+apSV2jdeEpAM/sF6nC44gAAXnUj3j 21Q/q0lrBj2oYuap3ETZKPhMuSLJov/BUzTAGAUpK07R9Q+VTnTDdkTr4Eye1lAQhKRo 8jOcfxVi9OjTly3JuKbVAyclQ8UcfTAkzW961p4nqrVVW42EMekom3puLfmAH2s9vUMB k9MDFi87Qba36g91mYXnitRLo/4DeUO0Js0MS1t/l4egHZmPi8Sx6dJaaaAgE8acZJV+ bJfOfBtAXbsZH9hk9BUSMkYVmVx/L9WsNt/28gq7WVAdDElvL7LhyyZTPrWTdb+bxvXl QNkg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.9.212 with SMTP id c20mr30637213wib.65.1373341444532; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 20:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:44:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUZMAuDocwZWXn9a+Xj3kkcX0uyRgjDmy-hQxpTDKWj3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:44:06 -0000

On 8 July 2013 20:03, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>; wrote:
> Or they didn't understand the consequences yet.... Also, it's
> easy to object on a mailing list, while in a meeting room, you'd have
> to provide an alternative and it's really hard to come up with such an
> alternative IMHO.

Hey Silvia,

We were there, in person, in Lyon, last November, but there were just
two of us.  We even had a viable alternative.

It's easy to dismiss two people.  Almost as easy, if not even easier,
to dismiss an absent mass.