Re: [rtcweb] Preserving stream isolation when traversing the network

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 07 March 2014 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8AD1A012B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:26:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ZWGOTu0fLXt for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54891A006F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:26:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x48so4705644wes.35 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:26:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yBiceNRuFZyK5JTSKxL8nfNF+SqFside7DOM7hZfnJI=; b=oNrD2AQCCEsufuliVWKfCp3YQZHO/mR5OjVX5GS3o3/clqiCev4F+RVXoyixvo2s8R saJM+uJFo7pX1CJH+nehq72gFbtFYXxTg8UzChYhQ0tYFfQeTEWIYaIsIg8vbSXbMDxY SHqVuT8fe778VjthWCv3W08K9g+z22o4knGBz2AL8cfa4cu5cAxm9VoNrOtA/4qr/vud MOwjJqVVGSbSFTdFBQpXfikMSLDlop0Afg7Hyy1UxfGmGwu441apGFZUVP/9Of5MbhKN 5XkE/cQ2lIVxKwIgYZFQk33uqxzb8Cv7SF/d9Tq9BDYuUOLSNUxLM1RdCXcQt9MWVqdv vCtg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.192.233 with SMTP id hj9mr17947303wjc.78.1394187960011; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:26:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.10.196 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 02:25:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <96BB79F5-4548-4E0F-BF37-E886D09A18A2@phonefromhere.com>
References: <CABkgnnVZpOJU=2ip88jF=sa2a7K=jBhZA0zkovPo_vvTBwA-GQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX3vnGRacpDcnhhb8MhTWRgJTZSLT7E9duG-yV7oSbtEw@mail.gmail.com> <96BB79F5-4548-4E0F-BF37-E886D09A18A2@phonefromhere.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:25:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXBmMZ-eD3NGzd2ZkmPT2nauh2M2enf-TzramfRhDF6nQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/WatHGA_BDCXgPJdh6HB0ufy-AoI
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Preserving stream isolation when traversing the network
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:26:06 -0000

On 7 March 2014 10:23, Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> wrote:
> Where in the DTLS handshake? There is a risk that if it is too early,
> then we are raising an un encrypted flag saying to the DPI crowd
> "look at me, I'm interesting".

Ahh yes, and I wish them luck.

So if you read the draft I referenced (it's short), it's a TLS extension.

In TLS 1.2, those are in the clear.

But in TLS 1.3 we are encrypting extensions.  I expect that browsers
will have TLS 1.3 fairly quickly.