Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Sun, 29 April 2012 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAA121F8454 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.891, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xy5y1e5dKI58 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc2-s32.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s32.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE1D21F8446 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W7 ([65.55.111.71]) by blu0-omc2-s32.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:57 -0700
Message-ID: <BLU169-W7C59E1EDB4CB06B648577932B0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_bf9870df-b537-46a4-b37b-3ea50337790d_"
X-Originating-IP: [24.16.96.166]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: jim.barnett@genesyslab.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:57 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F066@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCYArLPRP3c00UdOja64WRT6ghN0PSy7XvM_wbxBBB+vA@mail.gmail.com>, <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F066@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2012 17:20:57.0726 (UTC) FILETIME=[70D869E0:01CD262C]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:20:59 -0000
I agree that the corporate call center use case is important. > Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:35:55 -0700 > From: Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com > To: ted.ietf@gmail.com; rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft > > I would like to see a corporate call center use case. Specifically, a > user downloads a web page from a corporate web site, clicks a 'call us' > button and is connected to a gateway server that is controlled by the > corporation. The communication up to the corporate boundary cannot be > eavesdropped, but, inside the corporate boundary: 1) the corporation > can route the call to whoever it wants (meaning that the caller can > verify that he is connected to the corporation, but is not necessarily > assured of the identity of the person he is speaking to within the > corporation) 2) the corporation can eavesdrop/record the call (n.b. this > is mandatory in financial institutions, and common in most others). > > This corresponds to a very common current PSTN use case (except that > with webRTC the call is more secure up to the corporate boundary). I > think that corporations will be eager to add webRTC support to their > call centers - as long as it doesn't mess up their existing operations > (call routing, recording, etc.) They will most likely want to put in a > gateway, and treat it as the webRTC endpoint. Inside the gateway the > call should look just like one that came in from the PSTN (via a SIP > trunk or PSTN/SIP gateway.) > > I think others have suggested use cases involving outbound calls from > corporations, but I think that those should probably be treated > separately. > > - Jim > > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Ted Hardie > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:15 PM > To: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: [rtcweb] Use Case draft > > The chairs would like to ask the working group to focus on the use case > draft. If you have use cases that need to be added to the document or > text changes you'd like to suggest, please send them in for discussion > before May 15th. After this round, we will look toward having a working > group last call on the document (hopefully before the interim meeting). > > regards, > > Ted, Magnus, Cullen > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Timothy B. Terriberry
- [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft (privacy) Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Igor Faynberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Cavigioli, Chris
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - Eavesdropping. Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Igor Faynberg
- [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoints [… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] interworking with non-WEBRTC endpoin… Xavier Marjou
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft - legacy interop Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integrity … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integr… Dan Wing
- Re: [rtcweb] Consent freshness and message-integr… Harald Alvestrand