Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Sun, 29 April 2012 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAA121F8454 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.891, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xy5y1e5dKI58 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc2-s32.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s32.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE1D21F8446 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W7 ([65.55.111.71]) by blu0-omc2-s32.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:57 -0700
Message-ID: <BLU169-W7C59E1EDB4CB06B648577932B0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_bf9870df-b537-46a4-b37b-3ea50337790d_"
X-Originating-IP: [24.16.96.166]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: jim.barnett@genesyslab.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:20:57 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F066@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCYArLPRP3c00UdOja64WRT6ghN0PSy7XvM_wbxBBB+vA@mail.gmail.com>, <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD810616F066@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2012 17:20:57.0726 (UTC) FILETIME=[70D869E0:01CD262C]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:20:59 -0000

I agree that the corporate call center use case is important. 

> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:35:55 -0700
> From: Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com
> To: ted.ietf@gmail.com; rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
> 
> I would like to see a corporate call center use case.  Specifically, a
> user downloads a web page from a corporate web site, clicks a 'call us'
> button and is connected to a gateway server that is controlled by the
> corporation.  The communication up to the corporate boundary cannot be
> eavesdropped, but, inside the corporate boundary:  1) the corporation
> can route the call to whoever it wants (meaning that the caller can
> verify that he is connected to the corporation, but is not necessarily
> assured of the identity of the person he is speaking to within the
> corporation) 2) the corporation can eavesdrop/record the call (n.b. this
> is mandatory in financial institutions, and common in most others). 
> 
> This corresponds to a very common current PSTN use case (except that
> with webRTC the call is more secure up to the corporate boundary).  I
> think that corporations will be eager to add webRTC support to their
> call centers - as long as it doesn't mess up their existing operations
> (call routing, recording, etc.)  They will most likely want to put in a
> gateway, and treat it as the webRTC endpoint.  Inside the gateway the
> call should look just like one that came in from the PSTN (via a SIP
> trunk or PSTN/SIP gateway.)
> 
> I think others have suggested use cases involving outbound calls from
> corporations, but I think that those should probably be treated
> separately.  
> 
> - Jim 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Ted Hardie
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:15 PM
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] Use Case draft
> 
> The chairs would like to ask the working group to focus on the use case
> draft.  If you have use cases that need to be added to the document or
> text changes you'd like to suggest, please send them in for discussion
> before May 15th.  After this round, we will look toward having a working
> group last call on the document (hopefully before the interim meeting).
> 
> regards,
> 
> Ted, Magnus, Cullen
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb