IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 08 November 2013 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE1D21E8085 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:48:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKNhLx-s+nLP for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432E121E805F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-b7d7.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b7d7.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.183.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rA8Nmaab076194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:48:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <527D7854.1080307@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:48:36 -0800
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
References: <CEA19328.A9A84%stewe@stewe.org> <527D6BFA.9090509@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUF5gOk3miDRtj1R1j5btZBGDBkM7_+yHNtGYg-027HNMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUF5gOk3miDRtj1R1j5btZBGDBkM7_+yHNtGYg-027HNMg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 31.133.183.215 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:48:49 -0000

On 11/8/13 15:20, Peter Thatcher wrote:
> [S]ome people (FOSS projects) will have to ignore the spec if H.264 is 
> the MTI, because they have no choice... 

You appear to have somehow missed Cisco's announcement last week.

> Of course, you may then speculate in return that no one cares about 
> FOSS projects and browsers, which I speculate would be an ironic 
> coming from someone representing a FOSS project.

I think your assertion is trivially disproved by the fact that we, as a 
FOSS project, are going to support H.264 for WebRTC.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email