Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls"
Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Fri, 12 August 2011 19:03 UTC
Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2636811E809E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ub8K4MgJk6ym for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E3111E8090 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD24F170C; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:04:06 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mx; bh=hrPCV5j9XR7YXW GZCkkioSAdfoY=; b=gk9pRvqTRHrCH27pnUcwOIcAL0nU4iiag5QkyyZlQrXgSr dDI50bVkDsiCV6jl74ehS/H+RkczflhRkkEuTZk+MOZNmOF0F+rLW7VwKUz5mJWr xoudsDMsvVy/FQmbGGwoRWlqqMe3xjJmfyj4qv8gaVcI98l8rCPCUhBDsrmP4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mx; b=dYG7z0xHuEZaLiGzAwPFbG e+pg90EJ38pXxNkduN0kKBzqQQdRdZZdcYkW1vrfv01DzTQidiP8loNhMpLPkIug qy0+VL+NxgzC50snStAsyCS0B2A4Kq3iCKCwRbisziTp9oNmkUk9s3uVUUTFctht DjisdlTVayLyoUVFuIBjc=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB8E7F8; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:04:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B138F3507F63; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:04:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TsWjL1ie3B8x; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:04:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.155.2] (unknown [198.202.199.254]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D5BC3507F5D; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:04:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E457915.7010809@skype.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:03:49 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBFwX9KiPDGwOZaANJuMO6J_wh06CPt+9+=y6iJL-hzXA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBFwX9KiPDGwOZaANJuMO6J_wh06CPt+9+=y6iJL-hzXA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls"
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:03:32 -0000
On 8/12/2011 10:47 AM, Ted Hardie wrote: > Do others think defining something like this would be useful? No. For the same reason I don't think that Gmail should be implemented by going to "imap:mail.google.com/inbox" and having the browser implement a mail reading user interface or it own (or even having a page that contains "<showIMAPinterface mailbox='inbox' server='mail.google.com'/>"). We should be providing components that allow for all manners for real-time communication applications to be built using HTML and JavaScript, not baking a phone into the browser. Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Timothy B. Terriberry
- [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] URIs for rtcweb "calls" Harald Alvestrand