Re: [rtcweb] No Plan

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 29 May 2013 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EE521F96FC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GmAmCDLHmgM8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540EC21F96A3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29CF0411D6; Wed, 29 May 2013 17:00:46 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51A6859A.4070106@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:47:54 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <BLU404-EAS183E8C6EC78BF3F108964C793900@phx.gbl> <51A66B3B.6070005@gmail.com> <CAL02cgTjJ7RrOZWUUFHCsEGSFSHSkDEt2kEfXB94HV2VzyDPPQ@mail.gmail.com> <51A66FFF.9050905@stpeter.im> <CABkgnnXeYuJG6Cm_ZZr4tKmVXJFBmPJV+MvYhrECRf=uHxMnHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXeYuJG6Cm_ZZr4tKmVXJFBmPJV+MvYhrECRf=uHxMnHQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] No Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 22:48:04 -0000

On 5/29/13 4:17 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 29 May 2013 14:15, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>> As Alan Lakein used to say: "Failing to plan is planning to fail."
>> Hopefully that's not true of the "No Plan Plan" for RTCWEB. :-)
> 
> I hope that what Emil intends is for these other things to be
> addressed by expanding the WebRTC API in various ways to accommodate
> the use cases we've identified.
> 
> There's an argument for not doing these things in SDP.  It's also
> known as Comment 22.

Yes, agreed. I have yet to read Emil's proposal in depth, so my comment
was just a general observation and not feedback on the I-D.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/