Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Mon, 18 November 2013 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC94511E84DA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 04:45:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.477, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n+-7gLGcTlsb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 04:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD5511E849B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 04:45:16 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f1c8e000005ceb-6b-528a0bdb23ad
Received: from ESESSHC020.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 91.73.23787.BDB0A825; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:45:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:45:12 +0100
Message-ID: <528A0BD8.1070409@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:45:12 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <5283DFDC.4010906@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5283DFDC.4010906@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrJJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre5t7q4ggyNT1C3W/mtnd2D0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxuIfD9kK/opUPHz6krGBcbNAFyMnh4SAicTattUsELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hAQOMUq8PnSKGcJZzihx5e5NRpAqXgFtidmHP7CB2CwCqhLzO34wg9hsAhYSN380 gsVFBYIlzr9azA5RLyhxcuYTsA0iAqISrx9PY+1i5OAQFrCUuHDcBCQsBDSyfecEsFZOAR2J La8Xs4GUSAiIS/Q0BoGEmQX0JKZcbWGEsOUlmrfOZoZpbWjqYJ3AKDgLybJZSFpmIWlZwMi8 ipE9NzEzJ73ccBMjMPgObvmtu4Px1DmRQ4zSHCxK4rwf3joHCQmkJ5akZqemFqQWxReV5qQW H2Jk4uCUamAU98up+/g8+iBT6z1HJZHrpxw+fWE4dEN49vs7GU/uf1EI5zJqtH5RJFEyxV/n Vk//bdMaMcY/2Y81+wLC9hn8mNy+ue/On4ezLkxlMbqsPvsQU6pa7wMtUdbyYyVzpbPqnhjb PLt3+fmVrMsXbK3mvGiJuFZ39GGUUMyuu6+PftWavt3zyc9eJZbijERDLeai4kQAYjnDpgwC AAA=
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:45:36 -0000

WG,

The current list of proposed alternative are the following one:

 The following alternatives has been proposed:

  1. All entities MUST support H.264
  2. All entities MUST support VP8
  3. All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8
  4. Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8, other entities MUST
     support at least one of H.264 and VP8
  5. All entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8
  6. All entities MUST support H.261
  7. There is no MTI video codec
  8. 5+6, i.e. All entities MUST support H.261 and all entities MUST
     support at least one of H.264 and VP8
  9. All entities MUST support Theora.
 10. All entities SHOULD support both H.264 and VP8. All entities MUST
     at least implement one of those. Entities that do not support both
     H.264 and VP8 MUST implement H.261.

The deadline to propose additional alternatives are: 27th of November 2013

Cheers

Magnus

On 2013-11-13 21:23, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> I hope everybody had a safe trip back home after Vancouver.
> 
> As you all know, we need to make progress regarding the selection of the
> MTI video codec. The following are some of the alternatives we have on
> the table:
> 
>  1. All entities MUST support H.264
>  2. All entities MUST support VP8
>  3. All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8
>  4. Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8
>  5. All entities MUST support either H.264 or VP8
>  6. All entities MUST support H.261
>  7. There is no MTI video codec
> 
> If you want the group to consider additional alternatives to the ones
> above, please let the group know within the following *two weeks*. At
> that point, the chairs will be listing all the received alternatives and
> proposing a process to select one among them.
> 
> Please, send your proposals in an email to the list. You do not need to
> write a draft; just send the text you would like to see in the final
> document regarding video codecs.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> Responsible AD for this WG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------