Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 911D421F8BB7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Tue,  6 Sep 2011 09:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.522
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077,
 BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h+5eWR9D9Tbs for
 <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  6 Sep 2011 09:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lon1-msapost-1.mail.demon.net (lon1-msapost-1.mail.demon.net
 [195.173.77.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AB421F8BB2 for
 <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue,  6 Sep 2011 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mangole.dcs.gla.ac.uk ([130.209.247.112]) by
 lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net with esmtpsa (AUTH csperkins-dwh)
 (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) id 1R0yCJ-0001VZ-Xy;
 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:08:27 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E6640FC.8080108@jitsi.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:08:26 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C88BD0C8-7AA5-4826-BE75-083A68A84B6F@csperkins.org>
References: <DB0C463A-FF5F-4C15-B2B4-E81B7DF92351@cisco.com>
 <4E6640FC.8080108@jitsi.org>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semantics
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list
 <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>,
 <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>,
 <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:06:42 -0000

On 6 Sep 2011, at 16:49, Emil Ivov wrote:
...
>> 3) When a new codec is specified, and the SPD for the new codec is
>> specified in the MMUSIC WG, no other standardization would should be
>> required for it to be possible to use that in the web browsers.
>=20
> I was about to suggest we should also mention the result from the
> PAYLOAD WG here (rather than MMUSIC only) but I believe that's =
actually
> what Colin meant.


The standards are done in PAYLOAD (was AVT before the split), not =
MMUSIC, true. My main point though was that the codec names and =
parameters aren't defined in terms of SDP, but rather using MIME media =
type names and parameters, which happen to currently get mapped to SDP.=20=


--=20
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/