Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 19 July 2013 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5393711E82E0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.183, BAYES_40=-0.185, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O75hTgsQ+-7E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F5F11E82BD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id hu16so4230768qab.15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=8G/eIOxQF/5oBWdubAIGXBj93TfL1OrW6QdYGFALJn0=; b=a09IEghe1Z0nGv7mCIu918oZeb6Jg8mGC0s/R+TuMOgcvfHIAc0NxrvutGWsBzwdLf Vo4Qj7pyBuH2/96312XP+9qhyCzbR/0dLBSSlFnswI02VYrNB2Hz5ijx4/pVWPNWer06 TGnNpBC0tEtDXNo1wSf6SrMmiVTpyEBNfN71WKz9prVya/KBh/Cy1er4LQ/rKTAP6U+1 GBUIMtWpqLMhApDf5s3Cx75QJhZ3h4tPcEwbWQxm02tRwgMxxyyZ2XxtPJZkPa4+Qy+P 31/8bLow1t5m1X1BqxzzlPejqJeW/0+5RG/ztyYVEyqSXhrt8eSE4pn3wruGSZTMeBFY 5w3g==
X-Received: by 10.229.112.6 with SMTP id u6mr4097065qcp.47.1374246237605; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.72.132 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C50FDAD5-492C-4A83-AD6D-464242FB4A05@iii.ca>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CD1E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <BLU401-EAS386F88B3FE140492B39B59693610@phx.gbl> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484213E41E7@TK5EX14MBXC265.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <C50FDAD5-492C-4A83-AD6D-464242FB4A05@iii.ca>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:03:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfneUj=kzDjR_E1=S-bqAajaPUE3f_A2g8oGriFyPhamPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkpkGeCZYmc/CrAO28t8/PuDhILmI1FjeQpyC0JS84ll/c0c8trQ+QP3Om264XoSNGYw+xN
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:04:19 -0000

2013/7/19 Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>;:
> Folks wanted to sort out how mindless works fist before getting to theses smaller details

Hi Cullen,

All these "smaller details" are in fact issues and problems we don't
need. Issues not needed at all in WebRTC, issues that WebRTC
developers and vendors should NOT care about. If those "smaller
details" do exist is due the mandate of SDP. And all the time the WG
(or WGs) will spent "fixing/defining" them is just wasted time, since
nothing useful is being done for WebRTC by "defining" those "minor
details".

Regards.


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>;