Re: [rtcweb] Simulcast was Re: Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and MSIDs for synchronization

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com> Thu, 21 February 2013 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D957B21F8DAE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:51:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NLDdOZvvDNIf for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx1.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A5C21F8D94 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.6.88] (ip-64-134-182-52.public.wayport.net [64.134.182.52]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx1.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E0E1F2248 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:50:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51263439.8050402@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:50:33 -0800
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120625 SeaMonkey/2.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CABcZeBO105HXWoRAbaAR0fGTCLtDmAyjt-DOM=aKy80sg2SG_Q@mail.gmail.com> <51140038.3040001@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBP_-ce-JT-oDkpkDoRKjrZo+m7NLTcifCOsRBM_qKPTmg@mail.gmail.com> <511407AA.1040501@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBO0oSYw-M-1wVujftiYdBtJ67SBfMp4k5gSm45HFhZ+=A@mail.gmail.com> <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C0882804788D71@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> <51157034.3020800@alvestrand.no> <51164AFC.80700@ericsson.com> <51165FCA.2040707@alvestrand.no> <511796C6.3050601@ericsson.com> <511820F9.5080806@alvestrand.no> <5118EDC1.2000809@ericsson.com> <5119F155.8090303@alvestrand.no> <511C66BE.7090105@mozilla.com> <511CABC6.3050502@ericsson.com> <511CDFDC.20703@mozilla.com> <511CF7A3.40005@ericsson.com> <511D2048.7030500@mozilla.com> <51263183.3010402@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <51263183.3010402@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Simulcast was Re: Proposal for dealing with CNAMEs and MSIDs for synchronization
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:51:06 -0000

Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> When it comes to simulcast in WebRTC perspective I am especially worried
> that choices might be made that would prevent including simulcast
> without much effort in the future.

Agreed. That's why I'm trying to spend at least a little time thinking 
about it now, even if we don't expect to ship support for it in the 
first iteration of WebRTC. I look forward to your updated draft.