IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] NAT Draft

Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> Thu, 03 November 2011 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5741F0CB6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.982
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.982 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.384, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_VISITOURSITE=2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5OoQ8iQBoU2R for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFCC1F0CBB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so569053qyk.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=m+ylJQ1ppCedmulTI7h2cC9Cp5AaEElpIQEI6/qP6+I=; b=abTAQuBIMThyVTGIJHQwn/GkyV4p13q5/hdXlMv7h9IdI2KOXpa64GIp/Q1ZTJPovc 4VhoCdIej58OPlztWsKvYiRtJJb34pBjNMswET22aGYQrNKgL8jiWrdzG35Yj9f8LOx9 1lnAfGc88ii5PlwcIEts25Qmg8yNuVsCZkWf8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.169.97 with SMTP id ad1mr6921276igc.35.1320355028395; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.230.8 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.230.8 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852235789600@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <E37C139C5CB78244A781E9E7B721527B54858D@USSCMB03.plt.plantronics.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852235789600@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:17:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGSspS+SF140yvL+4YfDym6V4pe6NgO57HnfBZH-VdsKSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f2359a971e52404b0db1cbe"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "Bran, Cary" <Cary.Bran@plantronics.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] NAT Draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:17:10 -0000

On Nov 3, 2011 12:03 PM, "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A couple of questions for clarification.
>
> In section 3.3, what does "RTC-Web clients MUST support IPv4 to IPv6
transition." really mean? I think you need to clarify.
>

Hopefully nat64 rfc 6146

Cb
> In section 4.1, can we put requirements on gateways? Maybe we should
rather say that RTCWeb clients shall accept cases where the remote ICE
client supports ICE lite, or something like that. Because, there might not
even be a gateway, but a legacy UA that actually supports ICE :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Bran, Cary
> Sent: 1. marraskuuta 2011 0:23
> To: rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] NAT Draft
>
>
>
> Hello WebRTC chairs,
>
>
>
> I have updated and submitted a 02 version of the WebRTC NAT draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-cbran-rtcweb-nat-02.txt
>
>
>
> I believe that this draft is representative of areas where the working
group has achieved consensus and at this time I would like to ask that the
02 draft be adopted as a working group document.
>
>
>
> I look forward to your feedback.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Cary Bran
>
> Senior Director Advanced Software Technology and Architecture
>
> Office:  +1 831-458-7737     Cell: +1 206-661-2398
>
> Plantronics  Simply Smarter Communications(tm)
>
> 345 Encinal St., Santa Cruz, CA 95060
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents,
files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain information
that is confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, please DO NOT disclose the contents to another person, store or
copy the information in any medium, or use any of the information contained
in or attached to this transmission for any purpose. If you have received
this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
email or at privacy@plantronics.com, and destroy the original transmission
and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
>
> For further information about Plantronics - the Company, its products,
brands, partners, please visit our website www.plantronics.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email