IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt

"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com> Thu, 09 May 2013 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C7121F914C; Thu, 9 May 2013 11:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cn+2NU3HWcZj; Thu, 9 May 2013 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021A521F90D2; Thu, 9 May 2013 11:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.235]) by senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (Server) with ESMTP id 9E09A1EB8534; Thu, 9 May 2013 20:43:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.1.159]) by MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.235]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 9 May 2013 20:43:10 +0200
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOTMzUZ6qA2ycCEU+xahGCAxHFJpj9LqVA
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 18:43:09 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF11591D10@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <20130503054601.4639.64651.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zAi_Lx3QFCbBQ5aPNkgorJAff0E79jkpbQX1Qt3wf2bzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1Wk6u7XiYrNVmoqr5Jisu2WRvZpte7hQTOiP8YHUc6hg@mail.gmail.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134DC6B8@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134DC6B8@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 18:43:17 -0000

ON: 09 May 2013 16:50 Cullen Jennings (fluffy) Wrote:

> 
> I think my largest questions was does an endpoint have to know when it
> carets an offer if that is going to be sent to a legacy end point or
> not. I'm particularly interested in multiscreen video conferences
> systems.
> 

The same question also seems relevant to the respun plan A given that the temptation will be to use a=bundleonly which greatly simplifies the offer (i.e. less confusion over candidates etc.) but at the cost of interoperability with legacy multiscreen systems.  Don't you agree?

Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email