IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 11 November 2011 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EBD21F863E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:52:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.94
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.94 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L86KdE+R8ve5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E7A21F8548 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so4163265vws.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.65.14 with SMTP id t14mr21408475vds.47.1321023125100; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:52:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.118.132 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:51:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [74.95.2.173]
In-Reply-To: <474200CA-F509-438B-A9CD-71742F4AF6B7@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <20111031211134.8188.49554.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EAF64FF.8020101@jesup.org> <02485FF93524F8408ECA9608E47D9F2007CACFFAC2@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> <474200CA-F509-438B-A9CD-71742F4AF6B7@lurchi.franken.de>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:51:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOEUseuR-dHkxxnan1Gy0aKG+07DSTJAGzOt7ii_2aw3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:52:06 -0000

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Michael Tuexen
<Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>>  o DTLS and SCTP handshakes must be performed serially (no matter which order they happen in), which increases the number of round-trips necessary to establish communication.
> That is correct. SCTP adds one RTT to whatever DTLS is requiring.
> So when using SCTP/DTLS/UDP, DTLS needs 3 RTTs (including the initial
> RTT required for the Cookie exchange).
> When using DTLS/SCTP/UDP DTLS needs 2 RTTs (since there is no need for
> the DTLS Cookie).

There's no need for the DTLS cookie in either case, actually, since ICE provides
the appropriate proof of return routability.

Also, DTLS should probably be used with False Start here, so you can reduce
to one RTT.

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email