Re: [rtcweb] No Plan
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Thu, 30 May 2013 15:14 UTC
Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613D21F9113 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.209, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id quOiMxk7C3KZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1265A21F8FF8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id iB4A1l0021vXlb85CFE3QA; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:14:03 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id iFE31l00X3ZTu2S3dFE38B; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:14:03 +0000
Message-ID: <51A76CBA.7030106@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:14:02 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <BLU404-EAS183E8C6EC78BF3F108964C793900@phx.gbl> <51A66B3B.6070005@gmail.com> <CAL02cgTjJ7RrOZWUUFHCsEGSFSHSkDEt2kEfXB94HV2VzyDPPQ@mail.gmail.com> <51A715E6.6060703@telecomitalia.it>
In-Reply-To: <51A715E6.6060703@telecomitalia.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1369926843; bh=3n1zo8Ca9srNo7iCcrkEETweHlX30xlryRNBOgEF4Aw=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=ms3oOnBs2nKCEmbykoJ2mtf6fYk8Oe4vHADcIh37sBrVlMORad0xgl+bZPF95HLsm d9QTeEJyiQGl64OMzeaOWCMsbI/ThtH/DpPFovrpx2diDK8wYzHR1S18R2DB5vjHvt 34ueNnhEcTRSyWmo9Q42Laf4a8zvhDGx8xjN/bdxZ7uJnB6U1/MEZvrf7T06V4a+yO bPzTa53M0lIEdOp+kCfBRRRUw1Cm1zJ2gp/dypNsHdfWW12owodhMNxbeJFW2oFr3P mU2vs+GVdt+4CNUyPeEIjAhdnK5ZhXkWPxVfIpVpg6eL9adJTHfquCvDebxOIu0ls4 ZM449e9Da48hg==
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] No Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 15:14:09 -0000
On 5/30/13 5:03 AM, Enrico Marocco wrote: > On 5/29/13 11:00 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: >> Like Paul, I'll reserve a full judgement until I've had a little more >> time to digest this. At first read, though, it seems like there's a lot >> of "magic happens here" in the draft. There's an example of how you >> establish a legacy-compatible stream, and an assertion that JS can do >> the rest. The truth of this assertion isn't obvious to me. It would be >> helpful if the document had an example of, say, how one might add a stream. > > This is how I'd do it, in a way that seems quite consistent with no-plan: > > 1. sender gets the additional local tracks > > 2. sender tells the receiver on the app-specific signalling channel > (assuming a plain-english-over-something one): "I can also send you > video and audio of a webcam I've just installed in the girls locker > room. They'll have SSRC xxx and yyy" (xxx and yyy retrieved through > JS API -- kind of what exists in Chrome today for stats) > > 3. receiver responds "Shoot!" What does the receiver say if it can use the media, but cannot receive it over the *existing* audio and video m-lines where it is receiving other media already? Thanks, Paul > 4. sender attaches the new tracks to the local stream attached to the > existing connection > > 4.1. if appropriate media lines exist (i.e. with the required > media type and payloads), new media will be sent there, > same ports, new SSRCs > > or > > 4.2. if a new media line is required, the sender receives an > event to be handled by an > RTCSessionDescriptionCallback-like callback that triggers > renegotiation in the usual app-specific way (AFAIK the API > doesn't have such an event right now) > > 5. receiver gets addtrack notifications and the application will take > care of their display, according to the app-specific information > received on the app-specific signalling channel > > The most critical part here is 4.2 (i.e. additional O/A exchanges, what > no-plan tries to reduce). It would probably never happen when the sender > is a browser, seldom otherwise. > > I'm certainly not the greatest JS expert, but I don't see an easier way > to achieve this. I'm also not the greatest expert of legacy RTP devices > (although I deal with them every day), but I'm pretty convinced that for > such non-trival scenarios some kind of gatewaying will be required > anyway. The no-plan approach seems to make it easier than both plan A > and plan B. > > Enrico > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Sergio Garcia Murillo
- [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Richard Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Martin Thomson
- [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Enrico Marocco
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Enrico Marocco
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - PT based MUX Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Mark Rejhon
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- [rtcweb] RTT (was Re: No Plan) Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was Re: No Plan) Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was Re: No Plan) Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Barry Dingle
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was: No… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Jim Barnett
- Re: [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was… Roni Even
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Christer Holmberg
- [rtcweb] Repair Flows and No Plan (Was: No Plan) Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) BeckW
- Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan ) Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] Repair Flows and No Plan (Was: No Pl… Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Emil Ivov
- [rtcweb] Plan xyz discussions; MMUSIC <> RTCweb R… Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] No Plan - but what's the proposal Peter Thatcher