IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-behave-turn-rest-00.txt

Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de> Mon, 22 July 2013 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9744F11E814E; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.011, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uv1B3cAJhYYJ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (lost.IN.psyced.org [188.40.42.221]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBC821F9C12; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (p54970320.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.151.3.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r6MKkvug017375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:47:00 +0200
Message-ID: <51ED9A3C.4060307@goodadvice.pages.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:46:52 +0200
From: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
References: <20130715214906.5314.83583.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zBA_unaQekMkKwKwKNRPbJjECAtJ9bAV=fv6V6Mdfon6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2WGi_fD9mVx+dtZBo+X4-sXxXZFek9mt2cAmrqFCyYMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJWm+fGBDec_66WMBVhsv5TD8hVzDoOtd5CGs7xAHZqkYtDGBg@mail.gmail.com> <51E70106.8060100@goodadvice.pages.de> <CAJWm+fGUEH43bgR1j56qea3+uSVQ63myr1tZkrdYRGEmBw=zew@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2wzEQXSMPM4bnGW5_0ciDf9VuY1nb2xp=Wbqe0Rq5yZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJWm+fE1G2r0TcUAcZUVCP0WRSC35JFBdZ-oMqJfAykhNExqyA@mail.gmail.com> <51ED9318.6000003@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <51ED9318.6000003@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, mom040267@gmail.com, behave <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-behave-turn-rest-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:47:08 -0000

Am 22.07.2013 22:16, schrieb Adam Roach:
> What Justin proposes gets us this inter-vendor interop cheaply and
> easily. What you're counterproposing forces people into a single-vendor
> (or, at least, partnered) solution, which kinda defeats the purpose of
> defining this in an SDO in the first place.

Right. What Justin proposed was originally located at
https://code.google.com/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=1197
I liked the plan, implemented it in restund and improved it a litle. It 
was discussed at 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/discuss-webrtc/nn8b6UboqRA/discussion 
and also implemented in rfc-5766-turn-server.

Rough consensus and running code...

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status