Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 22 January 2014 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F491A00F0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:46:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.736
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rQYtjF1uEJ4M for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC091A00E7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orochi-2.roach.at (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s0MEkVem001516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:46:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <52DFD9C2.4070804@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:46:26 -0600
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
References: <CALiegfkJe1QfMcPoDg4+71oujHUzJy86_pnLXDO9C=g_v8_4Lg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D107730@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfkhs5JeVj-2YL2QJgwMgB1cP77aUZEWdoywQCpQd_O6Ag@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D10819E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmyOayaz41FM+3xF733srs8MUKGMumW7nAfT53EnfEaWw@mail.gmail.com> <52DD7889.8030209@alum.mit.edu> <CALiegfn1CwsOmN7TdFvBG-5590q9dmyhyRJK3H6u15Ux6H=LNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfn1CwsOmN7TdFvBG-5590q9dmyhyRJK3H6u15Ux6H=LNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 99.152.145.110 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:46:41 -0000

On 1/22/14 08:34, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> This is completely unnecessary if we skip the SDP tradition. There is 
> no need at all for endpoint-A to tell endpoint-B "you can send me up 
> to 8 audio tracks since I have added 8 m audio lines in my SDP offer, 
> otherwise you can only send me a single audio track, but you can send 
> me later a re-offer". This is something that ORTC "fixes".

Continually attempting to re-litigate a closed point of consensus is 
disruptive. Please stop.

/a