Re: [rtcweb] Video Draft

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 27 October 2014 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51711AD4C8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YSW73If0DD_e for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 616CB1AD4C2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s9RKxK38055482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:59:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110] claimed to be Orochi.local
Message-ID: <544EB228.9040306@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:59:20 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <544EAFB0.40106@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <544EAFB0.40106@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/XsZqg4oyZqL4yAdNxTG539bqX9c
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:59:30 -0000

...and pretty much right after I sent this out, someone pointed out to 
me that I'd mistakenly put "H.264" in the VP8 section when I was talking 
about VP8. So now there's a -02 out there. It simply fixes this rather 
confusing typo.

/a

On 10/27/14 15:48, Adam Roach wrote:
> Based on feedback from (and since) Toronto, I've put out a new version 
> of the video draft:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-01
>
> Deltas:
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-01.txt
>
> Some of this is forward-leaning (e.g. the colorspace) so as to provoke 
> a disucssion. As such, I will indicate ahead of time that some of this 
> text still needs discussion and agreement within the working group. 
> The areas where I have done this are clearly marked with "TODO."
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb