Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Mon, 25 November 2013 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9401ADE87 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:43:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EhzUyuIgUCzl for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:43:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635F51AD947 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:43:33 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7eff8e000000eda-fc-5293621425a2
Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 83.34.03802.41263925; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:43:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:43:32 +0100
Message-ID: <52936207.5040704@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:43:19 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leon Geyser <lgeyser@gmail.com>
References: <52935C89.5040408@ericsson.com> <CAGgHUiQnkQKkc-ptMu6DtfUYJY6N9i7PUaeAqKxp96nB2MQBGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGgHUiQnkQKkc-ptMu6DtfUYJY6N9i7PUaeAqKxp96nB2MQBGA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra5o0uQgg5nHOS26V89is1j7r53d gclj56y77B5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mo4/fAzS8Ev0YrNzQcZGxhfC3QxcnJICJhI PPvxmgXCFpO4cG89WxcjF4eQwCFGia+vdjNDOMsZJXZNvsoMUsUroC3xcdVKMJtFQFVia991 VhCbTcBC4uaPRjYQW1QgWOJq7zqoekGJkzOfgG0QEVCW+PhtC1gNs4C6xJ3F59hBbGEBL4kl D+eA2UICBRLX/q8Cm8kpECjx/McNoF4OoOvEJXoagyBa9SSmXG1hhLDlJZq3zmaGaNWWaGjq YJ3AKDQLyeZZSFpmIWlZwMi8ipE9NzEzJ73caBMjMFQPbvmtuoPxzjmRQ4zSHCxK4rwf3joH CQmkJ5akZqemFqQWxReV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamAUCw9Y+lot4QF/13KfqRmV7Q01thYl7nPmM/7c /sch79L6O7Whn4Kfpc2Sui4qr7riYFNO05bJWXkBJQznHOu3R3XZ1DxeW3/lq/FH7ucuysa1 5e9XsPLb3F79Z3V5pd925u0fZolsW+L0ZA6/xyOX9TVFl+p0fk+bd+1Hj/5ar4LG5xcLZecq sRRnJBpqMRcVJwIA4445MyMCAAA=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:43:36 -0000

On 2013-11-25 15:30, Leon Geyser wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
> 
> Was H.263 a typo?
> I agree that 10 can be changed to:
> 10. MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP, H.261}

Sorry,

I did a mistake in this call. I missed that 10 and 11 talked about H.261
and H.263 respectively.

I think the above question of writing 10 in the above proposed format is
then the relevant question to the WG.

Cheers

Magnus

> 
> 
> 
> On 25 November 2013 16:19, Magnus Westerlund
> <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com <mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>>
> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     I would like to draw your attention to the following two alternative:
> 
>     10. All entities SHOULD support both H.264 and VP8. All entities MUST
>         at least implement one of those. Entities that do not support both
>         H.264 and VP8 MUST implement H.261.
> 
>     11. MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP, H.263}
> 
>     I would note that 10 and 11 are equivalent on the MUST level. The only
>     thing that separates 10 out is the SHOULD implement both H.264 and VP8.
> 
>     Thus my question to the WG and especially the ones proposing 10 and 11.
>     Would anyone disagree with removing alternative 10. in favor of 11.?
> 
>     Just trying to avoid having two alternatives that are extremely close to
>     each other. My thinking is that if we manage to select any MTI, i.e.
>     MUST statements, we can discuss what SHOULDs and RECOMMENDATIONs that we
>     want to make in addition.
> 
>     Cheers
> 
>     Magnus Westerlund
>     (As WG chair)
> 
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
>     Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
>     SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
>     <mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     rtcweb mailing list
>     rtcweb@ietf.org <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------