Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Fri, 19 July 2013 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE28221F9D71 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6RaeXhYWgBAh for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBDE21F8415 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c10so65972wiw.17 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=AjfRruU+is5uRSKPt8r894u4ZSPyRSl51SgPxKfi8XA=; b=UMePftjG+p609yULGvnhvLoix3/6ErppT5ULk8CSTlQs9dEQkAJz2cnfl8YJki2xZm i7X9bki43zHGhGm39loj6tEMK1S6H7thJy1a9fENWxnjsWNL9wu9vEL8jSTpk3AKB4kP aBd2tlNQYeNS3bhBhO8sisspKGXPgs1Jt7xFkVuvb/irs5HMUSQouTLyfyWdbpYA9yhI +Q+CtKsG8Hi5VN1Z0567aKcn96mxGXayFCM7Raz3zmkgTsoil7GRP5lK+k1/+VZZ58K3 0283uSpkZViysThJ6rgO1epdBLxBfnW2iEoHV6xm64re+Hx0nbw7pAlXoMjmW9uT/w5s 0UXA==
X-Received: by 10.180.96.73 with SMTP id dq9mr12231416wib.51.1374255535375; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fb9sm49846674wid.2.2013.07.19.10.38.54 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hj3so68349wib.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.185.133 with SMTP id fc5mr23051745wic.8.1374255530323; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.221.202 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51E978C2.8000002@nostrum.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CD1E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <BLU401-EAS386F88B3FE140492B39B59693610@phx.gbl> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484213E41E7@TK5EX14MBXC265.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <C50FDAD5-492C-4A83-AD6D-464242FB4A05@iii.ca> <CALiegfneUj=kzDjR_E1=S-bqAajaPUE3f_A2g8oGriFyPhamPA@mail.gmail.com> <51E96B5B.2050302@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxsgSoRg=OcAKLWZpQNzseW5oSHimoa83LHXegZad4i=sA@mail.gmail.com> <51E978C2.8000002@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:38:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxsiAp9W0mC5uF1607hFteDYEO_FwKsiDrkdtbPPKBi-Vw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c355feb738e304e1e0cc64
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnSzY9yLboZ96yEMEKKb1yzaEVKGyGGqQAc3zL3mMWwkNiOtdErwGCPpw35FieepTlNK4oS
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:39:21 -0000

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; wrote:

> On 7/19/13 12:29, Roman Shpount wrote:
>
>> First of all, a lot of the issues you are talking about are not yet
>> solved.
>>
>
> That was my *point*.
>
>
And my point is that each time you solve any of those issue you will break
all the applications working so far. Not a good API design.
_____________
Roman Shpount