IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Mon, 31 October 2011 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16FF11E80AD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.315, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cEvQljSYqqMp for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E5711E8085 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id p9V3UBBW025897 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:30:11 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 7395_16ea_a3accd4a_0370_11e1_8351_001d096c566a; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:30:11 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:42781) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S1565EB6> for <rtcweb@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:30:12 +0900
Message-ID: <4EAE163C.4070603@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:30:04 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
References: <4EAC6BF4.2000604@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <4EAC6BF4.2000604@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] URI schemes for TURN and STUN
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:30:12 -0000

On 2011/10/30 6:11, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> Hi,
> being in the process of scanning all the drafts with -rtcweb- in them, I
> came across these two:
>
> draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-00.txt
> draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-turn-uri-00.txt
>
> Just three comments:
>
> - I think it's not RTCWEB business. They should be pointed at the home
> group for STUN/ICE.

For TURN, there's already
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uri-bis-04.

Regards,    Martin.

> - I do not think it's appropriate to use "turn" and "turns" for
> indicating transport. Polluting the URI namespace with more
> configuration parameters in the form of trailing "s" is a Bad Thing.
> - Passing passwords in URIs is generally a Bad Practice. If you really
> want this in this case, please explore the implications thereof fully in
> the Security Considerations section.
>
> Good luck with the discussion (elsewhere)!
>
> Harald
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email