Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

[Alexandre GOUAILLARD <[e-mail]>]

1.a No
  .b Feeling not comfortable with h.264 situation / license / IP.
2.a Yes
3.a No
  .b In our opinion, only one MTI is needed to have interop. More than one
would not improve interop, but would increase risks and maintenance.
4.a No
  .b browser should be treated differently. It's taking the risk of
defining several class of citizens, and have to handle a definition of
"browsers" (do application which include webkit fall under this for
example.)
5.a No
  .b This does not provide a common codec for interop. between webrtc
implementations.
6.a (Barely) acceptable
  .b We are concerned that the quality achievable, and the bandwidth
requirement are barely acceptable, however, we could live with it.
7.a No
  .b We believe we need a common codec for minimal interop.
8.a No
  .b same reason as 3.b
9.a Acceptable (neutral, would prefer 2)
10.a No
    .b Same as 3.b
11.a No
    .b Same as 3.b
12.a No
    .b Same as 3.b
13.a No
    .b same as 1.b replace 264 by 263
14.a No
    .b Same as 3.b
15.a No
    .b does not solve the problem of encoding.
16.a No
   .b Same reason as 6.b, just worse.




>    1.
>
>    All entities MUST support Motion JPEG
>    1.
>
>       Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]:
>       2.
>
>       Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize
>       them:
>
>
>
>  H.264 is a reference to the proposal in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal/>
>
> VP8 is a reference to the proposal in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8/>
>
> Theora is a reference to Xiph.org Theora Specification from March 16, 2011
> (http://www.xiph.org/theora/doc/Theora_I_spec.pdf)
>
> H.263 is a reference to profile 0 level 70 defined in annex X of ITU-T rec
> H.263 (http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.263/)
>
> H.261 is a reference to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4587
>
> Motion JPEG is a reference to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2435
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>