Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb@ietf110: agenda posted

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 12 March 2021 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A92C3A1917 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:48:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJWT1psEDXzY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3A5A3A1924 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.3.157] (unknown [78.156.11.215]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34C497C536F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:48:43 +0100 (CET)
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <3A09060E-C513-4153-B04E-9E9F74BE9370@sn3rd.com>
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <80430506-0507-cb2c-7686-6ed8e81b2c2d@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:48:43 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3A09060E-C513-4153-B04E-9E9F74BE9370@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------52DCCBC35DD854001E4B4F61"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/YCR9sIeR9tylIrvm0iGdDs3FCCY>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb@ietf110: agenda posted
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:48:48 -0000

I offered Sean to present a few words on the problem of "NAT 
Slipstream", and why I think it's a matter that belongs in the RTCWEB 
security considerations document.

Slideware attached; this is strictly an "if interest and time" topic.


On 2/24/21 9:32 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> Hi!  Here’s an agenda for our 2-hour Friday time slot.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/agenda-110-rtcweb-00
>
> Spt
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb