Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Sat, 05 November 2011 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654AB21F886A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.746
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.746 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oT2Vh5a0q9er for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D4121F8801 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gye5 with SMTP id 5so4067447gye.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.173.74 with SMTP id bi10mr23063339igc.4.1320501471398; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fu10sm12666968igc.6.2011.11.05.06.57.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so4855767iae.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.0.208 with SMTP id 16mr5947599ibc.50.1320501469624; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.62.170 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfkUKY8kfa89Lx__D2ug-hRChHTyUYRTQWfxy1X_RBM60w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E37C139C5CB78244A781E9E7B721527B5485F6@USSCMB03.plt.plantronics.com> <CAErhfrwEZ86DCQOREhUQ2eMP99LKf2ausAvWbKYX5oj=_6YDyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAErhfrwNwd3NZmWb7L3+F72dBKi=mrhYJoMXkVREbXRXS8E-HA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkVir+qYbviNZdNMJ3ECCaGACPBLdN+dxH3f6Pk7W3s+Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAErhfrwfgDQDiOiPh3R7fGSr-Qy97f2DmPF_vLAp-GqnF1qBdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkUKY8kfa89Lx__D2ug-hRChHTyUYRTQWfxy1X_RBM60w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 09:57:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxt3eWo+Z==4XjKjzuY+aeugW1VD8478ExeS+fDVKROqSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?I=F1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151773e4f205b82704b0fd359f
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@orange.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:57:52 -0000

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> There is long rationale in this mailist about why SRTP must be
> mandatory for every WebRTC scenarios, without being optional per Web
> site.
>
>
There is an equally long rational of the opposite. I do not think consensus
was reached in this regard.
_____________
Roman Shpount