Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt

Note - I regard the Plan A / Plan B conflict as the "long end of the 
pole" with regards to resolving issues regarding SDP signalling in 
RTCWEB - and as such, I regard it as very important to get it resolved.

The silence on this issue is disquieting.

            Harald

On 05/03/2013 08:08 AM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> Scribbled down the basic concepts of what I have been referring to as 
> "Plan B" - a way to signal multiple MediaStreamTracks in SDP without 
> needing a separate m= line for each.
>
> Hopefully this will make discussion of this topic easier.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
> Date: Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:46 PM
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
> To: Justin Uberti <justin@uberti.name <mailto:justin@uberti.name>>
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Justin Uberti and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:        draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan
> Revision:        00
> Title:           Plan B: a proposal for signaling multiple media 
> sources in WebRTC.
> Creation date:   2013-05-03
> Group:           Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 15
> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
> Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan
> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>    This document explains how multiple media sources can be signaled in
>    WebRTC using SDP, in a fashion that avoids many common problems and
>    provides a simple control surface to the receiver.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb