IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Sat, 26 October 2013 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D278921E80A7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.543
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.945, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yBrhLTEEuSH2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8312821F9E7C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id as1so8953146iec.27 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=jhpNbJULZBK0MVjsHoiQHsDAl17s3HXbT3q/hWd1OvQ=; b=Q6QpXhZA7SkM9mli2r6DOIjoU0+T3c2wDQEcH9XhGgxMA39WSn4YOtKPdN2GOU4alu kI23stCN5EsPrsXkQmCSJDTvlmN0vnD7OWTuajcP/1fsOTYHS/1FPHF7HQ7n64ZAv9ga YT/mbgsKva5+OgdJiLRKaXgkuMrQpuhiPwU+nkotkmu0XW3ztLfj5xN98n+ptIDKNek9 VdzPzo4m+qFfeklHd9pmtvAkvvOS8QUfEufdC7hzwEysiPfiU1gdwiT8OWA48kZgRQ+x ITGc8eSblRdK6+pWPz+MeHFs64zaK4oGrxvzkw7+V1bb6XWb5EHC/M621JG/zth3MEKc ucmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnquu5oIWtU3tfWwcPA7UfZsKheTWT40HXKeb6qMFzXPPvsfe3sOJB1+h+6f1B3X3s2Gpa1
X-Received: by 10.42.142.129 with SMTP id s1mr9353984icu.30.1382827659643; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i3sm10893807igh.0.2013.10.26.15.47.36 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <526C4686.2080702@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 18:47:34 -0400
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <52681A96.2020904@alvestrand.no> <526826AF.5030308@librevideo.org> <52690090.2050609@alvestrand.no> <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DFCD683@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4843D45DC08@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <5269764C.4030801@librevideo.org> <52698758.5040404@bbs.darktech.org> <CAD6AjGSb5syh0HO+89fH8cGZ0zqM6gYLPj3aeTRQLN0u8W4cSg@mail.gmail.com> <5269F098.2020904@alvestrand.no> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A0F272E@008-AM1MPN1-043.mgdnok.nokia.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0BF358@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAGgHUiRtXUAJTotAFX7YwQ6cS_OD-MpAb+898c6OYxm7D5xXKw@mail.gmail.com> <FCBEDCB500188C488DA30C874B94F80E1C01158C@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-1iV4_SvToRYYtDZszxkSDF0qmrS4YN8w7OFQ3p29CaDw@mail.gmail.com> <526AE703.8000409@bbs.darktech.org> <CA+9kkMC=RrmAEyd0uWjpPhvCGuUnj5ATmuZrA7FnAxXhqMJXrg@mail.gmail.com> <526C15CD.5020601@bbs.darktech.org> <526C3FE4.2040301@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <526C3FE4.2040301@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020604090800030404010902"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:48:01 -0000

On 26/10/2013 6:19 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> I actually think Martin Thomson and Travis Leithead have been giving 
> great input and been positive contributors. Not to belittle the 
> contributions of others, but those two especially have made many 
> positive contributions.
>
>>     An open process has to feel genuine, not just in words, but also 
>> in actions.
>>
>
> I think we may have some differing perspectives.

I guess what I'm saying is... if all is well, then what's going on with 
Microsoft and Apple? What's their official position regarding MTI? Will 
it impact their intent to bundle WebRTC in their browsers? If we truly 
have an open process and representatives from Microsoft and Apple 
sitting on the WG then I would expect to get official answers to these 
questions.

I've seen multiple representatives from Microsoft, but not a single 
person from Apple. Is anyone representing them in an official capacity?

Gili

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email