Re: [rtcweb] Data Channel Negotiation and reopening of decisions

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 18 February 2013 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C40721F8D17 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:44:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id by35w2y8uxpJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2E321F8D18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1p0q1l00B0EZKEL51zkSMC; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:44:26 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1zkR1l00c3ZTu2S3MzkRe6; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:44:26 +0000
Message-ID: <5122BCD9.5090708@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:44:25 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnWUpMSBLioSD2+p82vGszX9R0Q4WFfME5j-DuK+B7KVJw@mail.gmail.com> <511B6C9A.4090904@jesup.org> <CABkgnnUiCKuv_=mgLFf4sRnOb1bY190N7E_+V8gfTbKEUTBnDw@mail.gmail.com> <511CB20C.7020003@jesup.org> <CABkgnnU0idt+ntpKjTCMUCVFO9=_fSjGRPikD6Nk_Uem3L7E8g@mail.gmail.com> <89FAFB5C-9D03-4B76-A306-01F9E4EC4105@lurchi.franken.de> <CABkgnnXFrqTo2QpLhjWt5CmcQc6Kv4=vAgd3DgyndNtL1ewm7g@mail.gmail.com> <8E2722E7-F82A-48D4-80FB-C76929A2E324@lurchi.franken.de> <CABkgnnWzX2tpbadnB3DjhmB7cm6poCDvmxdAW2Z_stMbovJ3gw@mail.gmail.com> <A0FDFC7C-2C85-431C-A03E-0E486F9378D1@lurchi.franken.de> <CABkgnnWdjV7F9jkbap91q-pLygzWJsTvAOh-m=-9q4VrU9DGUg@mail.gmail.com> <DA07C056-3E80-4E30-B078-5547A174549D@skype.net> <511F287E.8030500@jesup.org> <3A70CC40-2BB4-40FD-A1B0-3257EC973757@skype.net> <CCA6E561-9792-4799-BE6F-E26C8CB8CDE7@lurchi.franken.de> <512265BA.7090206@alum.mit.edu> <CABkgnnXxq7BHhF5JtzfH8oe55e1GMMq2yQy0=pcE1+drBwqFxw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXxq7BHhF5JtzfH8oe55e1GMMq2yQy0=pcE1+drBwqFxw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1361231066; bh=3wqgfTfhj6xkJ8D2WhinQmGqNsayaHOItwi+XdVdr6Q=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=Ix4D1t1KyWqWIDnaxFDjCCObPIX74uW19P7WOwRKl2TNtOxt2LRH+bdglmaENakk4 4BZCb0TAZB4ikcd9+/VEyF/TSYiRc2jwdNAVgRu9+7rYzHgYr/0kwvpW8AaucsUPcj GVlutvRN01LymntSG2jFY6WmbmkNtbQkjl+6CYxTp6zJNgZnuOeh/QBLyy8NtsFaWc f6hj9Txr4LNOnzbE+lIUCONYR83jNvaBbZFV1SsBiuMX03esluVVs/zuvTAchmL3hF wNb6MXXYbONOy2vXw6uwJ12kHbtYjkBvDYp21SXy62Mk/LU9GO3nDGBQpEIU16u4rl b8Q4Gl2RfZf9g==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Data Channel Negotiation and reopening of decisions
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:44:32 -0000

On 2/18/13 2:22 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 18 February 2013 09:32, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> So why not provide two levels of API:
>>
>> 1) a low level one that exposed "pure SCTP" with one-way streams
>>
>> 2) a "websocket compatible" API layered on (1).
>
> This isn't really necessary.  There's a trade-off that I think can be
> made without losing much.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-rtcweb-data-00

Yeah, that seems sufficient.

	Thanks,
	Paul