Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 17 January 2013 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC75E21F87CE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:05:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iSq+Y0BkCtNc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC22C21F879D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-144-32.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.144.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0HH5aSD076605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:05:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <50F82F60.9090605@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:05:36 -0600
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Rejhon <markybox@gmail.com>
References: <50D2CC6A.4090500@ericsson.com> <24103_1358435764_50F815B4_24103_9252_1_2842AD9A45C83B44B57635FD4831E60A076013@PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAA79oD=kqbfHq9DCsVu06NPvcF=MxaGguNi-Tu5P-bXQxZPcAg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA79oDmRn9+mwQx98ZG-2znwgLoJVYNnBsEwXDO67VnVi=BE=Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA79oDmRn9+mwQx98ZG-2znwgLoJVYNnBsEwXDO67VnVi=BE=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 99.152.144.32 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:05:51 -0000

On 1/17/13 10:13, Mark Rejhon wrote:
> Precedent: Mozilla's support of H.264 on platforms that have hardware
> H.264 built in.

You might benefit from re-reading the announcement of that support; in 
particular the second-to-last paragraph:

https://brendaneich.com/2012/10/html5-video-update/

/a