IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Mon, 15 December 2014 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAA21A1EF5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:43:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voxFiW-YW-NO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x229.google.com (mail-vc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116D21A1B4A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:43:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hy10so6101356vcb.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:43:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nnqBTEKwXaA5GEIIa8IWf9/c0Bv1CrnNmrolVwhJSE0=; b=lX15sok2D7Cq3Y6FLgyaoldvdHnbWF51H4Y9QFvyxGKvJ78PGR06u87cgWJ2Mp+E9W lIK5BoLgqJ6bH/fZ26qC1ipvpg4pPBrK/XtvJoZkdsTG7w/bErRNmuTOIUQXqgXbwONm de5O6lmgHgvSUcqjZ5TdDJ0PWOcPU6P7kol+rCTLoateQYjfRpQl9Pc7mGBGGlL+JNjk OwP6l2JKt2mWIGUNMLr3aigf0Cd7yRcZi4lm+Gk3bh0+86psLHAFuE6VLAfXGTUrXzFE 0FEWUU2ewaEJxKR8z1Bt+4JvOUixFknmdTihel9b2Qf+k8y37ztvxdnMmNQX04UoI+9i 351Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=nnqBTEKwXaA5GEIIa8IWf9/c0Bv1CrnNmrolVwhJSE0=; b=EZAHNeNLyzycllIqt9V3a471YolkAQ+L/Pvn5gFPxsF1YzkDnGwPVurVm0a5v6/VgT hJMZLD8V+GhlDCVd6P7Y0WltkqFkA4sQQwwvDqL+vu/DC1ZnVIWOtdXSxRdbtL2XO2gE ZOfwZ33uQvH/t+3aecmuGLcqVWOpPgUwMHu0zI6dE7ZutfPti4AAD3HJKg8stzAlbx1/ 36UeCs1OSAVIF1l0Ua1jfjDk0FoPl1zJvPqVU+Vfh7+Byyo1BNP7q5TM9fNCpX/rCGpo ntW8xuBDPKIacLumRfNFjMnx6xdVvG1H9mb8LmqhqYX+DllRpEJPuGIqlkm1i70DW4fh w1LA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlTtmgHgEHPDxVE51TUn6JNahpC8PIZOkpqbLowtf/Uao4vEKyXOhfBSPoqP5ADWAovvd+r
X-Received: by 10.220.143.16 with SMTP id s16mr21462729vcu.53.1418683433084; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:43:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.10.229 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:43:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E63FD67@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E63FB08@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <CABcZeBOpX0vM9NJeKY5e+S13oKrLW3Td53qcxRkCHa2=nv=EGg@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWBY1MTU1A2fWo0E5Y6TQ1o+vWSz22pnWz6+5s7SFQcP-g@mail.gmail.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E63FD67@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:43:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1NnS1QOF-Ujv7a=qCnXrQ0htd0b4TFUDaKgwik9Rd=-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b33db6a142080050a48fa5c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Yh6KZHtbNaHWtF1AULzHVLd3kK8
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:43:55 -0000

I think making it a requirement is probably premature until we have a WG
document that explains what should happen when you discover one of these
network-provided TURN servers. Once
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return-04 is accepted as
a WG doc, we can add a requirement for support for RETURN and server
discovery.

Unclear whether it needs to be MUST-strength until we get some
implementation feedback though.

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
wrote:
>
>  +1 Also wondering why it is not appropriate?
>
>
>
> F20 in the requirements draft states:
>
>
>
> F20     The browser must support the use of STUN and TURN
>
>            servers that are supplied by entities other than
>
>            the web application (i.e. the network provider).
>
>
>
> So I was thinking the need for specifying the discovery method would not
> be controversial.
>
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Simon Perreault [mailto:sperreault@jive.com]
> *Sent:* 15 December 2014 15:49
> *To:* Eric Rescorla
> *Cc:* Hutton, Andrew; rtcweb@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
> I do not believe that this is an appropriate requirement
>
>
> Care to say why?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email