Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

[Tim Panton <[e-mail]>]

> On 8 Dec 2014, at 17:39, Justin Uberti <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
> I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair. 
> 
> As stated before - I think this plan represents a legitimate compromise in what had previously seemed like a stalemate. While not my ideal outcome, I think this is good for the WebRTC ecosystem - it ensures interoperability, and provides a reasonably clear path for reaching a completely RF solution.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Martin Thomson <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> On 8 December 2014 at 08:05, Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> > Since others who were present in the room are repeating their position
> > on the list, I'll do so too.
> 
> That's probably a good thing to do.  An almost anonymous humming sound
> isn't a good basis for establishing a record.
> 
> > I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
> 
> +1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>
> 
> ____

+1

P.S. 
(Why are we still having this discussion? I feel like I fell into a time vortex and wiped out 18 months of progress)


Tim Panton - Web/VoIP consultant and implementor
www.westhawk.co.uk <http://www.westhawk.co.uk/>