Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 04 December 2014 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5821A7020 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:30:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmrpsfprnbpL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:30:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f51.google.com (mail-qa0-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0101A7010 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:30:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id k15so12336631qaq.38 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:30:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WFTxMYVJNATA3pgQNAyH15uzpF4W1xLVRrS4/uwmXE4=; b=JvldLERuUux1Rh84lIRWD+2r2xQb7/QoujgX+j3qTLvtYVcIkLDnHgtZR/++cF5blj vwOASdBj2534t8aVAprXVTb5oF9BKadKoK82Dpb0+zEtqn/yqvHSNEfEjcim5a3TnwYb Q/XFleArGv5HrrLS0ATkoGVScXCG812Zgq0rmAcuXS88YkiBLlDbjaC8VJi1vt7oxMYz izW4MbW+s76OBCEr48ATj1ixVcvqgdRyGi/aJmqWXdv7HXcFgiKcQ9MVlRGOunTiLbKX O4G20r4UP6lIGI3nQTWNCyp7HW5YpsIwVlAZ9XIsRDhTyul7avPRxL5syGhqaFXbbcBZ E1GQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmPldscEOa+JIXeoWOdL9GWOA9sZlWGVbz/rV/wL8Igqy1kx1raAEOgS213v1kNvnDjjPXu
X-Received: by 10.224.22.196 with SMTP id o4mr17857164qab.85.1417732252549; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:30:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.26.135 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:30:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <32C6F602-6818-4A36-B18E-BF21774F6761@apple.com>
References: <547511DB.5050100@nostrum.com> <54759A4C.6020806@gmail.com> <5476092D.4010406@nostrum.com> <15EF2452-2C2C-420B-B972-C37EACE57850@apple.com> <CALiegfkbiN1BAaJyrqOzUeYiViCGHcs6QaM7VVHwUzCUVAuKBw@mail.gmail.com> <32C6F602-6818-4A36-B18E-BF21774F6761@apple.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 23:30:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfnAyEzaua1Etymq2ny8-Rpi94LDKnLk3UM894Tu12x4-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Z6Dw2NwiYBLWfkrHw_75l2HuqMw
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:30:54 -0000

2014-12-04 23:03 GMT+01:00 David Singer <singer@apple.com>om>:
> Quite where you see the uncertainty and doubt in the “you MUST implement something which, it is stated, is subject to IPR which CANNOT be licensed”, I am less sure.  Fear, yes, I get that.

Just to clarify, I'm not in favor of mandating non 100% royalty-free
codecs in a W3C specification.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>