IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Sat, 21 December 2013 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE61A1ADF2F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:26:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KtzpHwvlqpFH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53DF1AD627 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:26:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orochi-2.roach.at (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rBLIQHqD023659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:26:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <52B5DD44.6030700@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:26:12 -0600
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
References: <CAP7VpsVy0sfZpGQ2Vj=NGnvNpSjRhFc+bSaDyCaLbTLkGUjRVA@mail.gmail.com> <CEDB11FC.3E281%stewe@stewe.org> <CAHp8n2k-sMt9JqAiSmM6jsueth0VfPVJmcYpFh9g6uPPiwjf3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp8n2k-sMt9JqAiSmM6jsueth0VfPVJmcYpFh9g6uPPiwjf3w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 99.152.145.110 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:26:27 -0000

On 12/21/13 12:00, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> Are you saying that Opus & G.711 are both MTI?

Yes.

There are several reasons why this ended being the case, all of which 
are fairly well documented in the minutes and email archives. If you 
want me to summarize these reasons privately, contact me off-list, and 
I'll give you a high-level explanation.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email